@article{ART002223694},
author={Kim Sung Yong and Young Jin Lee and Mi Na Jang and Chun Geun Kwon and Byung Doo Lee and Heeyoung Ahn},
title={Comparison of Fuel Characteristics between Pinus densiflora and Pinus koraiensis in Gangwon Province},
journal={Crisisonomy},
issn={2466-1198},
year={2017},
volume={13},
number={4},
pages={105-115},
doi={10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.4.105}
TY - JOUR
AU - Kim Sung Yong
AU - Young Jin Lee
AU - Mi Na Jang
AU - Chun Geun Kwon
AU - Byung Doo Lee
AU - Heeyoung Ahn
TI - Comparison of Fuel Characteristics between Pinus densiflora and Pinus koraiensis in Gangwon Province
JO - Crisisonomy
PY - 2017
VL - 13
IS - 4
PB - Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis
SP - 105
EP - 115
SN - 2466-1198
AB - This study identified fuel characteristics of surface and crown and analyzed crown fires on Pinus densiflora and Pinus koraiensis stands in Gangwon Province in Korea. Fifteen surface fuels of each tree type were sampled and 16 trees of each species were destructively sampled to identify crown fuel characteristics. Pinus koraiensis has higher surface fuel moisture content due to the difference in crown cover, although the two types show similar crown fuel moisture content. Pinus koraiensis (34.4%) has more crown needles than Pinus densiflora (25.7%), but two species have similar combustible of available fuel, 55.8% and 55.6%, respectively. The adjusted coefficients of determination(R2 adj) values were high (more than 0.850) in all crown fuel classes. The canopy bulk density of Pinus koraiensis was 1.56 times higher than that of Pinus densiflora, whereas the available canopy bulk density of Pinus koraiensis was 1.68 times higher despite the smaller canopy volume.
KW - Forest fire;Pinus densiflora;Pinus koraiensis;Fuel
DO - 10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.4.105
ER -
Kim Sung Yong, Young Jin Lee, Mi Na Jang, Chun Geun Kwon, Byung Doo Lee and Heeyoung Ahn. (2017). Comparison of Fuel Characteristics between Pinus densiflora and Pinus koraiensis in Gangwon Province. Crisisonomy, 13(4), 105-115.
Kim Sung Yong, Young Jin Lee, Mi Na Jang, Chun Geun Kwon, Byung Doo Lee and Heeyoung Ahn. 2017, "Comparison of Fuel Characteristics between Pinus densiflora and Pinus koraiensis in Gangwon Province", Crisisonomy, vol.13, no.4 pp.105-115. Available from: doi:10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.4.105
Kim Sung Yong, Young Jin Lee, Mi Na Jang, Chun Geun Kwon, Byung Doo Lee, Heeyoung Ahn "Comparison of Fuel Characteristics between Pinus densiflora and Pinus koraiensis in Gangwon Province" Crisisonomy 13.4 pp.105-115 (2017) : 105.
Kim Sung Yong, Young Jin Lee, Mi Na Jang, Chun Geun Kwon, Byung Doo Lee, Heeyoung Ahn. Comparison of Fuel Characteristics between Pinus densiflora and Pinus koraiensis in Gangwon Province. 2017; 13(4), 105-115. Available from: doi:10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.4.105
Kim Sung Yong, Young Jin Lee, Mi Na Jang, Chun Geun Kwon, Byung Doo Lee and Heeyoung Ahn. "Comparison of Fuel Characteristics between Pinus densiflora and Pinus koraiensis in Gangwon Province" Crisisonomy 13, no.4 (2017) : 105-115.doi: 10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.4.105
Kim Sung Yong; Young Jin Lee; Mi Na Jang; Chun Geun Kwon; Byung Doo Lee; Heeyoung Ahn. Comparison of Fuel Characteristics between Pinus densiflora and Pinus koraiensis in Gangwon Province. Crisisonomy, 13(4), 105-115. doi: 10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.4.105
Kim Sung Yong; Young Jin Lee; Mi Na Jang; Chun Geun Kwon; Byung Doo Lee; Heeyoung Ahn. Comparison of Fuel Characteristics between Pinus densiflora and Pinus koraiensis in Gangwon Province. Crisisonomy. 2017; 13(4) 105-115. doi: 10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.4.105
Kim Sung Yong, Young Jin Lee, Mi Na Jang, Chun Geun Kwon, Byung Doo Lee, Heeyoung Ahn. Comparison of Fuel Characteristics between Pinus densiflora and Pinus koraiensis in Gangwon Province. 2017; 13(4), 105-115. Available from: doi:10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.4.105
Kim Sung Yong, Young Jin Lee, Mi Na Jang, Chun Geun Kwon, Byung Doo Lee and Heeyoung Ahn. "Comparison of Fuel Characteristics between Pinus densiflora and Pinus koraiensis in Gangwon Province" Crisisonomy 13, no.4 (2017) : 105-115.doi: 10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.4.105