A Comparative Study on Strategies for Trust Recovery and Acceptance of Nuclear Power in Nuclear Power Plant Areas (원전주변 지역의 원자력 수용성과 신뢰회복 전략 비교 분석)

LIM, CHAE HONG (임채홍); Sunhee Kim (김선희)

doi:10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.11.133

A Comparative Study on Strategies for Trust Recovery and Acceptance of Nuclear Power in Nuclear Power Plant Areas

Crisisonomy
Abbr : KRCEM
2017, 13(11), pp.133-148
DOI : 10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.11.133
Publisher : Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis
Research Area : Social Science > Public Policy > Public Policy in general
Received : September 25, 2017
Accepted : November 22, 2017
Published : November 30, 2017

LIM, CHAE HONG ¹, Sunhee Kim ²

¹고려대학교
²서원대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study aims to search for strategies to improve local residents’ acceptance of nuclear power and trust recovery among people living near nuclear power station. For this objective, we built a theoretical model and empirically analyzed the micro-data at the individual level to highlight the particular attribute of each nuclear site, suggesting the implication of strategies for trust recovery. We examined the impact of (1) socio-demographic variables (gender, education, economic status, age, social class, ideology, and religion), (2) perceived risk (perceived risk, perceived benefit, trust, stigma, knowledge), (3) risk communication (quality of information, quantity of negative information), (4) social event (Fukushima accident, and corruption of KHNP), and (5) localities (economic, political characteristics and identity) on acceptance of nuclear power and strategies for trust recovery based on responses from local residents in four nuclear power stations in Korea. We discussed the implications of strategies for trust recovery considering the characteristics of localities.

KEYWORDS

nuclear power plant areas, acceptance of nuclear power, trust recovery

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

[journal] Alhakami, A. S / 1994 / A Psychological Study of the Inverse Relationship between Perceived Risk and Perceived Benefit / Risk Analysis 14(6) : 1085~1096

[journal] Cha, Yong Jin / 2000 / Risk Perception in Korea: A Comparison with Japan and the United States / Journal of Risk Research 3(4) : 321~332

[journal] 최연홍 / 2005 / An Empirical Study on the Policy Acceptance of Local leaders: Focusing on the Acceptance of Nuclear Facilities, Power Plant and Waste Disposal Site / 한국정책학회보 / 한국정책학회 14(4) : 57~90

[book] Douglas, M. / 1986 / Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences / Russell Sage Foundation

[journal] Fischhoff, B. / 1978 / How Safe Is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes towards Technological Risks and Benefits / Policy Sciences 9(2) : 127~152

[journal] Flynn, J. / 1993 / Decidedly Different:Expert and Public Views of Risks from a Radioactive Waste Repository / Risk Analysis 13(6) : 643~648

[journal] Flynn, J. / 1992 / Trust as a Determinant of Opposition to High-level Radioactive Waste Repository: Analysis of a Structural Model / Risk Analysis 12 : 417~429

[journal] Greenberg, R. / 2009 / NIMBY, CLAMP, and the Location of New Nuclear-Related Facilities: U.S. National and 11 Site-specific Survey / Risk Analysis 29(9) : 1242~1254

[journal] 김서용 / 2014 / Analyzing the Risk Judgement about Fukushima Nuclear Accident and Nuclear Power by Integrating the Risk-Perception Paradigm with Risk Communication Model / 한국행정연구 / 한국행정연구원 23(4) : 113~143

[journal] 김서용 / 2014 / Analyzing Koreans’Risk Judgement Process in Case of Fukushima Nuclear Accident: The Receiver’s Involvement and Ability in HSM(Heuristic-systematic information processing Model) / 정부학연구 / 정부학연구소 20(3) : 315~343

[journal] Kunreuther, H. / 1990 / Public Attitudes toward Siting a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository in Nevada / Risk Analysis 10(4) : 469~484

[journal] 임채홍 / 2014 / The Study on Negative Effect of Nuclear Corruption Scandal and the Mechanism of Trust / 한국행정연구 / 한국행정연구원 23(3) : 131~159

[journal] Liu, S. / 1998 / Information and Risk Perception: A Dynamic Adjustment Process / Risk Analysis 18(6) : 689~699

[journal] Peters, E / 1996 / The Role of Affect and Worldviews as Orienting Dispositions in the Perception and Acceptance of Nuclear Power / Journal of Applied Social Psychology 26(16) : 1427~1453

[journal] Prati, G / 2012 / Beliefs, and Values Antinuclear Behavi oral Intentions, Attitude, Trust, Environmental the Effect of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident on Risk Perception / Envir onment and Behavior

[thesis] Schmidt, M / 2004 / Investigating Risk Perception: A Short Introduction, Loss of Agro-biodiversity in Vavilov Centers, with a Special Focus on the Risks of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) / Ph.D

[journal] 서혁준 / 2014 / Analyzing Causal Factors Constructing the Local Energy Governance / 지방행정연구 / 한국지방행정연구원 28(4) : 283~312

[journal] Siegrist, M / 2012 / Acceptance of Nuclear Power:The Fukushima Effect / Energy Policy

[journal] Sjöberg, L. / 2003 / Attitudes and Risk Perceptions of Stakeholders in a Nuclear Waste Siting Issue / Risk Analysis 23(4) : 739~749

[journal] Sjöberg, L. / 2004 / Local Acceptance of a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository / Risk Analysis 24(3) : 737~749

[journal] Slovic, P. / 1987 / Perception of Risk / Science 236(4799) : 280~285

[book] Slovic, P. / 1982 / Judgement under Uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases / Cambridge University Press

[book] Slovic, P. / 1993 / Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste / Duke University Press

[journal] Slovic, P. / 1991 / Lessons from Yucca Mountain / Environment 33(3) : 6~30

[journal] Tanaka, Y. / 2004 / Major Psychological Factors Determining Public Acceptance of the Siting of Nuclear Facilities / Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34(6) : 1147~1165

[journal] Vivianne H. M. Visschers / 2013 / How a Nuclear Power Plant Accident Influences Acceptance of Nuclear Power: Results of a Longitudinal Study Before and After the Fukushima Disaster / Risk Analysis / Wiley-Blackwell 33(2) : 333~347

[journal] 왕재선 / 2013 / Analyzing the Change in Acceptance and Perception of Nuclear Power after Fukushima Nuclear Accident / 한국행정학보 / 한국행정학회 47(2) : 395~424

[journal] Williams, B. L. / 1999 / Risk Perception in Context: The Savannah River Site Stakeholder Study / Risk Analysis 19(6) : 1019~1035

[journal] Yamamura, E. / 2012 / Experience of Technological and Natural Disasters and Their Impact on the Perceived Risk of Nuclear Accidents after the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster in Japan:A Cross-country Analysis / The Journal of Socio-Economics 41 : 360~363

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Crisisonomy 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 0.64

A Comparative Study on Strategies for Trust Recovery and Acceptance of Nuclear Power in Nuclear Power Plant Areas

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

Crisisonomy 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 0.64

A Comparative Study on Strategies for Trust Recovery and Acceptance of Nuclear Power in Nuclear Power Plant Areas

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

Statistics

Tools

Issue List

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (3)

REFERENCES (29) * References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

Search PDF

Citation

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.