Crisisonomy 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 0.64
-
pISSN : 2466-1198 / eISSN : 2466-1201
- https://journal.kci.go.kr/cemtp
KJCKorea
Journal Central
Analyzing Attitude Change towards Nuclear Energy after the Fukushima Accident - An Application of Multilevel Modeling -
- Crisisonomy
- Abbr : KRCEM
- 2018, 14(12), pp.111-130
- DOI : 10.14251/crisisonomy.2018.14.12.111
- Publisher : Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis
- Research Area : Social Science > Public Policy > Public Policy in general
- Received : November 11, 2018
- Accepted : December 29, 2018
- Published : December 31, 2018
Sang-Seok Bae 1, Donggeun Kim 1, Kim SeoYong 1
1아주대학교
Accredited
ABSTRACT
The Fukushima nuclear accident had a significant impact on the attitude change toward nuclear energy.
This attitude change critically influences the energy transition, in particular, phaseout of nuclear energy.
The purpose of this study is to analyze the determinants of attitude change toward nuclear energy after the Fukushima accident. Since the attitude change is influenced not only by the individual variables but also by the contextual variables, it is necessary to set both the macro country-level variables and the micro individual-level variables as the causal variables of the attitude change. Empirical findings summarize that male, education, religion, risk perception, and trust at the individual level, and operation of nuclear power plant, GDP per capita at the country level had a crucial impact on attitude change from supporting to opposing.
Statistics
-
378 Viewed
-
5 Downloaded
Tools
Issue List
Citation status
* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.
[journal]
Alhakami, A. S.
/ 1994
/ A Psychological Study of the Inverse Relationship Between Perceived Risk and Perceived Benefits
/ Risk Analysis
14(6)
: 1085~1096
[journal]
Ansolabehere, S.
/ 2009
/ Public Attitudes toward Construction of New Power Plants
/ Public Opinion Quarterly
73
: 1~12
[confproc]
Balžekienė, A.
/ 2007
/ An Integration of Sociological Risk Theories Explaining the Nuclear Risk Perception in Lithuania
/ Paper to be presented at the conference Risk and Rationalities Queens' College
[journal]
Bird, D. K.
/ 2014
/ Nuclear Power in Australia: A Comparative Analysis of Public Opinion Regarding Climate Change and The Fukushima Disaster
/ Energy Policy
65
: 644~653
[web]
Black, R.
/ 2011
/ Nuclear Power 'Gets Little Public Support Worldwide
/ http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15864806
[journal]
Brody, C. J.
/ 1984
/ Differences by Sex in Support for Nuclear Power
/ Social Forces
63(1)
: 209~228
[journal]
차용진
/ 2003
/
AN ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR RISK PERCEPTION:WITH FOCUS ON DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE POLICY ALTERNATIVES
/ International Review of Public Administration
/ 한국행정학회
8(2)
: 33~47
[journal]
Coleman, C. L.
/ 1993
/ The Influence of Mass Media and Interpersonal Communication on Societal and Personal Risk Judgments
/ Communication Research
20
: 611~628
[journal]
Combs, B.
/ 1979
/ Newspaper Coverage of Causes of Death
/ Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
56
: 837~849
[journal]
Corner, A.
/ 2011
/ Nuclear Power, Climate Change And Energy Security: Exploring British Public Attitudes
/ Energy Policy
39
: 4823~4833
[web]
Morris, C.
/ 2017
/ Swiss Referendum Adopts Energy Transition with Nuclear Phaseout
/ https://energytransition.org/2017/05/swiss-referendum-adopts-energy-transition-with-nuclear-phaseout/
[journal]
De Groot, J. I. M.
/ 2010
/ Relationships between Value Orientations, Self-determined Motivational Types and Pro-environmental Behavioral Intentions
/ Journal of Environmental Psychology
30(4)
: 368~378
[book]
Douglas, M.
/ 1997
/ Culture Matters: Essays in Honor of Aaron Wildavsky
/ Westview Press
: 121~132
[book]
Douglas, M.
/ 1982
/ Risk and Culture: An Essay on The Selection of Technical And Environmental Dangers
/ University of California Press
[journal]
Flynn, J.
/ 1994
/ Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risks
/ Risk Analysis
14(6)
: 1101~1108
[journal]
Frewer, L. J.
/ 1998
/ Understanding Public Attitudes to Technology
/ Journal of Risk Research
1(3)
: 221~235
[journal]
Greenberg, R.
/ 2009
/ NIMBY, CLAMP, and the Location of New Nuclear-related Facilities: U.S. National and 11 Site-specific Survey
/ Risk Analysis
29(9)
: 1242~1254
[journal]
De Groot, J. I. M.
/ 2013
/ Values, Perceived Risk and Benefits, and Acceptability of Nuclear Energy
/ Risk Analysis
33(2)
: 307~317
[journal]
Gustafsod, P. E.
/ 1998
/ Gender Differences in Risk Perception:Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives
/ Risk Analysis
18
: 805~811
[journal]
He, G.
/ 2012
/ Nuclear Power in China after Fukushima: Understanding Public Knowledge, Attitudes, and Trust
/ Journal of Risk Research
17(4)
: 435~451
[book]
Heck, R.
/ 2009
/ An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Techniques
/ Routledge
[journal]
Huang, L.
/ 2013
/ Effect of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident on The Risk Perception of Residents Near A Nuclear Power Plant in China
/ Proceeding of Notational Academy Science. U S A
110(49)
: 19742~19747
[journal]
Huebner. Christian
/ 2013
/ Accelerated Energy transition in Germany after Fukushima: An Overview of the German Energiewende
/ Facts & Findings
104
: 1~9
[journal]
Jenkins-Smith, H.
/ 1994
/ Perceived Risk and Uncertainty of Nuclear Waste: Differences Among Science, Business and Environmental Group Members
/ Risk Analysis
14(5)
: 851~856
[confproc]
Katsuya, E.
/ 2011
/ Self-motivated Accident Prevention Activities at Enterprises in Japan
/ First International Seminar, SAFE '99, on Safety & Fire Engineering
: 417~427
[journal]
Kessides, Ioannis N.
/ 2012
/ The Future of the Nuclear Industry Reconsidered: Risks, Uncertainties, and Continued Promise
/ Energy Policy
48
: 185~208
[journal]
Kim, Young Hwan
/ 2013
/ Effect of the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster on Global Public Acceptance of Nuclear Energy
/ Energy Policy
61
: 822~828
[journal]
Kitada, A.
/ 2016
/ Public Opinion Changes after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident to Nuclear Power Generation as Seen in Continuous Polls Over the Past 30 Years
/ Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology
53(11)
: 1686~1700
[journal]
Kuklinski, J. H.
/ 1982
/ Citizen Knowledge and Choices on the Complex Issue of Nuclear Energy
/ AJPS
26
: 615~642
[journal]
Latre, E.
/ 2017
/ The Public Opinion Change after the Fukushima Nuclear Accident: The Role of National Context Revisited
/ Energy Policy
104
: 124~133
[journal]
Litmanen, T.
/ 1999
/ Cultural Approach to the Perception of Risk:Analysing Concern about the Siting of a High-Level Nuclear Waste Facility in Finland
/ Waste Management Research
17
: 212~219
[web]
Newport, F.
/ 2014
/ Americans Still Favor Nuclear Power a Year After Fukushima
/ http://www.gallup.com/poll/153452/americans-favor-nuclear-power-year-fukushima.aspx
[journal]
Viet Phuong Nguyen
/ 2018
/
Examination of different socioeconomic factors that contribute to the public acceptance of nuclear energy
/ Nuclear Engineering and Technology
/ 한국원자력학회
50(5)
: 767~772
[thesis]
Pedroso de Lima M. L.
/ 1993
/ Percepcao do Risco Sismico
/ Ph.D.
/ University of Lisbon
[journal]
Poortinga, W.
/ 2013
/ Public Perceptions of Climate Change and Energy Futures before and after The Fukushima Accident: A Comparison between Britain and Japan
/ Energy Policy
62
: 1204~1211
[journal]
Prati, G.
/ 2012
/ The Effect of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident on Risk Perception, Antinuclear Behavioral Intentions, Attitude, Trust, Environmental Beliefs, and Values
/ Environment and Behavior
45(6)
: 782~798
[journal]
노승국
/ 2017
/
Differentiated influences of risk perceptions on nuclear power acceptance according to acceptance targets: Evidence from Korea
/ Nuclear Engineering and Technology
/ 한국원자력학회
49(5)
: 1090~1094
[book]
Rohrmann, B.
/ 2000
/ Cross-Cultural Risk Perception: A Survey of Empirical Studies
/ Kluwer Academic Publishers
[thesis]
Schmidt, M.
/ 2004
/ Loss of Agro-Biodiversity in Vavilov Centers, with a Special Focus on the Risks of Genetically Modified Organisms(GMOs)
/ Ph.D.
[journal]
Siegrist, M.
/ 2000
/ The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology
/ Risk Analysis
20(2)
: 195~203
[book]
Siegrist. M.
/ 2010
/ Encyclopedia of Science and Technology Communication
/ Sage
: 600~601
[journal]
Siegrist, M.
/ 2013
/ Acceptance of Nuclear Power:The Fukushima Effect
/ Energy Policy
59
: 112~119
[journal]
Siegrist, M.
/ 2000
/ Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception
/ Risk Analysis
20(3)
: 353~362
[journal]
Siegrist, M.
/ 2005
/ A New Look At The Psychometric Paradigm Of Perception Of Hazards
/ Risk Analysis
25(1)
: 211~222
[journal]
Michael Siegrist, M.
/ 2014
/ Why Have Some People Changed their Attitudes Toward Nuclear Power After The Accident in Fukushima?
/ Energy Policy
69
: 356~363
[journal]
Sjöberg, L.
/ 2004
/ Local Acceptance of a High-Level Waste Repository
/ Risk Analysis
24(3)
: 737~749
[report]
Sjöberg, L.
/ 2006
/ Myths of The Psychometric Paradigm and How They Can Misinform Risk Communication
/ SSE/EFI
[journal]
Slovic, P.
/ 1999
/ Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science:Surveying the Risk-Assessment Battlefield
/ Risk Analysis
19(4)
: 689~701
[journal]
Slovic, P.
/ 1993
/ Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy
/ Risk Analysis
13(6)
: 675~682
[journal]
Slovic, P.
/ 1982
/ Why Study Risk Perception?
/ Risk Analysis
2(2)
: 83~93
[book]
Slovic, P.
/ 2000
/ Cross-cultural Risk Perception
/ Springer
: 55~102
[journal]
Spence, A.
/ 2010
/ Public Perceptions of Energy Choices: The Influence of Beliefs about Climate Change and the Environment
/ Environment and Energy
21(5)
: 384~407
[journal]
Stoutenborough, J. W.
/ 2013
/ Knowledge, Risk, and Policy Support: Public Perceptions of Nuclear Power
/ Energy Policy
62
: 176~184
[journal]
Tanaka, Y.
/ 2004
/ Major Psychological Factors Determining Public Acceptance of The Siting of Nuclear Facilities
/ Journal of Applied Social Psychology
34(6)
: 1147~1165
[journal]
Tsujikawa, N.
/ 2016
/ Changes in the Factors Influencing Public Acceptance of Nuclear Power Generation in Japan Since the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi. Nuclear Disaster
/ Risk Analysis
36(1)
: 98~113
[journal]
Vercelli, A.
/ 2014
/ Nuclear and Financial Meltdowns: The Impact of The Fukushima Accident on The Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy
/ FESSUD(Financialisation, Economy, Society And Sustainable Development)
76
: 1~42
[journal]
Visschers, V. H.
/ 2013
/ How a Nuclear Power Plant Accident Influences Acceptance of Nuclear Power:Results of a Longitudinal Study Before and after the Fukushima Disaster
/ Risk Analysis
33
: 333~347
[journal]
Visschers, V. H. M.
/ 2013
/ Nuclear Power Before and After Fukushima: The Relations Between Acceptance, Ambivalence and Knowledge
/ Journal of Environmental Psychology
36
: 77~86
[journal]
Wang, J.
/ 2018
/ Comparative Analysis of Public Attitudes toward Nuclear Power Energy across 27 European Countries by Applying the Multilevel Model
/ Sustainability
10(5)
: 1518~1538
[journal]
Webber. D. J.
/ 1982
/ Is Nuclear Power Just Another Environmental Issue? An Analysis of California voters
/ Environment and Behavior
14
: 72~83
[journal]
Whitefield, S. C.
/ 2009
/ The Future of Nuclear Power: Value Orientations and Risk Perception
/ Risk Analysis
29(3)
: 425~437
[journal]
Wiegman, O.
/ 1995
/ Perception of Nuclear Energy and Coal in France and the Netherland
/ Risk Analysis
15(4)
: 513~521
[journal]
Yamamura, E.
/ 2012
/ Experience of Technological and Natural Disaster and their Impact on the Perceived Risk of Nuclear Accidents After the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster in Japan 2011:A Cross-country Analysis
/ The Journal of Socio-Economics
41
: 360~363