The 3:1 Rule: A Viable Tool?

Motin Dylan

doi:10.37944/jams.v3i1.63

The 3:1 Rule: A Viable Tool?

Journal of Advances in Military Studies
Abbr : AdvMil
2020, 3(1), pp.23~34
DOI : 10.37944/jams.v3i1.63
Publisher : Institute of Defense Acquisition Program
Research Area : Social Science > Military Science > Other Military Science
Received : March 9, 2020
Accepted : April 16, 2020
Published : April 30, 2020

Motin Dylan ¹

¹Kangwon National University

Candidate

ABSTRACT

The 3:1 rule has a long history and has been used or criticized by scholars and military alike. The present article attempts to test of the 3:1 rule against historical data. It investigates the validity of the rule, whether expressed in terms of men, tanks, artillery, or combat power, by using and expanding data of past battles. Contrary to what has been stated by numerous researchers and by official publications, this study comes to the conclusion that the 3:1 rule has little applicability. This result has major implications concerning military planning and warfighting.

KEYWORDS

3:1 Rule, Force Ratio, Historical Data, Breakthrough Battle, Combat Power

Journal Copyright Policy

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2025 are currently being built.

[book] Allen, P. / 1992 / Situational force scoring : Accounting for combined arms effects in aggregate combat models / RAND Corporation

[journal] Armstrong, M. J. / 2015 / Refighting Pickett’s charge : Mathematical modeling of the Civil War battlefield / Social Science Quarterly 96(4) : 1153~1168

[journal] Bradford, J. P. / 1998 / Quantitative modeling of modern land warfare : Operation Desert sword(1991) / Defense Analysis 14(3) : 277~298

[book] Davis, P. K. / 1995 / Aggregation, disaggregation, and the 3 : 1 rule in ground combat / RAND Corporation

[journal] Dupuy, T. N. / 1986 / Mythos or verity? The quantified judgment model and German combat effectiveness / The Journal of Military History 50(4) : 204~210

[journal] Epstein, J. M. / 1988 / Dynamic analysis and the conventional balance in Europe / International Security 12(4) : 154~165

[journal] Epstein, J. M. / 1989 / The 3 : 1 rule, the adaptive dynamic model, and the future of security studies / International Security 13(4) : 90~127

[journal] Hart, B. H. L. / 1960 / The ratio of troops to space / RUSI Journal 105(618) : 201~212

[book] Hart, B. H. L. / 1979 / The German generals talk / Quill

[other] Headquarters, Department of the Army / 1976 / FM 100-5 operations / U. S. Government Printing Office

[other] Headquarters, Department of the Army / 1984 / The Soviet Army: Operations and tactics / U. S. Government Printing Office

[other] Headquarters, Department of the Army / 2010 / FM 5-0, the operations process / U. S. Government Printing Office

[journal] Kress, M. / 1999 / A new look at the 3:1 rule of combat through Markov stochastic Lanchester models / Journal of the Operational Research Society 50 : 733~744

[journal] Kupchan, C. A. / 1989 / Setting conventional force requirements: Roughly right or precisely wrong? / World Politics 41(4) : 536~578

[journal] Lawrence, C. A. / 2010 / Comparing the RAND version of the 3:1 rule to real-world data / The International TNDM Newsletter 3(2) : 30~36

[book] Lawrence, C. A. / 2017 / War by numbers: Understanding conventional combat / Potomac Books

[web] Lawrence, C. A. / 2019 / The U.S. Army three-to-one rule versus the 752 case division-level data base 1904-1991 / Mystics & Statistics / http://www.dupuyinstitute.org/blog/2019/10/31/tests-using-the-752-case-division-leveldata-base/

[journal] McQuie, R. / 1989 / The 3:1 rule in theory and in fact / Phalanx 22(4) : 7~

[journal] Mearsheimer, J. J. / 1982 / Why the Soviets can’t win quickly in Central Europe / International Security 7(1) : 3~39

[journal] Mearsheimer, J. J. / 1989 / Assessing the conventional balance: The 3:1 rule and its critics / International Security 13(4) : 54~89

[thesis] Motin, D. / 2018 / Military capability and willingness in Russia’s decision of attacking Afghanistan, Georgia, and Ukraine / 석사 / Kangwon National University

[confproc] Motin, D. / 2019 / Conventional balance and deterrence on the Korean Peninsula / Paper present at The Third Conference of Political Science Graduate Students from Flagship National Universities

[other] Posen, B. R. / 2009 / Breakthroughs: Armored offensives in Western Europe 1944 / Massachusetts Institute of Technology

[other] Raymond, A. D. / 1991 / Assessing combat power: A methodology for tactical battle staffs / U. S. Army Command and Staff College

[other] Ryan, J. T. / 1998 / Battle command in the storm : Lieutenant General Franks and VII Corps / U. S. Army Command and Staff College

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Journal of Advances in Military Studies 2025 KCI Impact Factor : 1.0

The 3:1 Rule: A Viable Tool?

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

Journal Copyright Policy

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2025 are currently being built.

Journal of Advances in Military Studies 2025 KCI Impact Factor : 1.0

The 3:1 Rule: A Viable Tool?

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

Journal Copyright Policy

Statistics

Tools

Issue List

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (0)

REFERENCES (26) * References for papers published after 2025 are currently being built.

Search PDF

Citation

* References for papers published after 2025 are currently being built.