본문 바로가기
  • Home

Rethinking dosimeter assignment for military radiation safety: Focusing on comparative performance of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and electronic personal dosimeters (EPDs) under portable x-ray exposure

  • Journal of Advances in Military Studies
  • Abbr : AdvMil
  • 2025, 8(1), pp.37~56
  • DOI : 10.37944/jams.v8i1.273
  • Publisher : Institute of Defense Acquisition Program
  • Research Area : Social Science > Military Science > Other Military Science
  • Received : February 28, 2025
  • Accepted : May 16, 2025
  • Published : April 30, 2025

Chi, Ho Sub 1 Park, Jungmi 1 Choi, Gyoungjun 1 Kang, Ku 1

1국군화생방방어연구소

Accredited

ABSTRACT

The increasing use of portable X-ray generators in military operations—particularly for explosive detection and counter-terrorism—has highlighted the need for a radiation safety strategy tailored to field-based, low-dose environments. This study evaluates the performance of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and electronic personal dosimeters (EPDs) under controlled pulsed X-ray conditions using the XRS-3 generator, focusing on their sensitivity, dose-response characteristics, and operational suitability in military contexts. The results showed that while TLDs exhibited high accuracy in cumulative dose tracking, they failed to detect radiation beyond 3 meters or at low pulse counts. In contrast, EPDs—although they showed some inconsistencies in cumulative dose measurements under low-dose conditions—successfully detected radiation at all distances and pulse settings. Their ability to provide immediate feedback and detect fluctuations in real time makes them more suitable for dynamic radiation monitoring in military field environments. The study provides a solid foundation for revising current military dosimetry protocols in current military radiation safety management practices.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2025 are currently being built.