@article{ART002129232},
author={박창현 and Lim Hyung Ho},
title={Selection of Manageable Diseases for Quality Assessment in Korean Medicine by Delphi Method},
journal={Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation},
issn={1229-1854},
year={2016},
volume={26},
number={3},
pages={129-141}
TY - JOUR
AU - 박창현
AU - Lim Hyung Ho
TI - Selection of Manageable Diseases for Quality Assessment in Korean Medicine by Delphi Method
JO - Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation
PY - 2016
VL - 26
IS - 3
PB - The Korean Academy Of Oriental Rehabilitation Medicine
SP - 129
EP - 141
SN - 1229-1854
AB - ObjectivesAs awareness of the public about Korean medicine health care and the social demand about improvement for quality of health care service is constantly rising, the quality evaluation of Korean medicine health care service is needed to improve the quality. Through trial of Delphi method, we tried to set the priority in short, medium, long term among the disease which is the subject of quality assessment.MethodsCarrying out the delphi survey to 50 experts of korean medicine who were rec-ommended by the 41 member societies of Korean medicine and related organizations, we selected final candidates for quality assessment. It is composed with total 2 rounds, and we investigated the priority in three aspects; the importance of the matter, possibility quality assessment, potential about if there's any chance of improvement.ResultsBy delphi method, we set the priority of quality assessment. Base on the result of the second round, we classified importance of the questions into above average, average, below average, and categorized items as short, medium, long term according on the final priority. We classified of musculoskeletal diseases and diseases of connective tissues and musculoskeletal injury as short term and cerebrovascular disease and disease of nerve sys-tem and malignant neoplasm as medium term, disease of digestive organs and diseases, symptoms and abnormal findings in clinical field or inspections which are not categorized as long term.ConclusionsWe set the subjects of quality assessment by delphi survey by experts, and classified into short, medium, long term. Further research is necessary for execution the Quality Assessment to each of the candidate. Also, we can send feedback to medical in-stitution base on the result of Quality Assessment. then it would be able to induce the im-provement in quality of medical institution by itself. (J Korean Med Rehabil 2016;26(3): 129-141)
KW - Selection of diseases;Quality assessment;Delphi method;Questionnaire
DO -
UR -
ER -
박창현 and Lim Hyung Ho. (2016). Selection of Manageable Diseases for Quality Assessment in Korean Medicine by Delphi Method. Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation, 26(3), 129-141.
박창현 and Lim Hyung Ho. 2016, "Selection of Manageable Diseases for Quality Assessment in Korean Medicine by Delphi Method", Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation, vol.26, no.3 pp.129-141.
박창현, Lim Hyung Ho "Selection of Manageable Diseases for Quality Assessment in Korean Medicine by Delphi Method" Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation 26.3 pp.129-141 (2016) : 129.
박창현, Lim Hyung Ho. Selection of Manageable Diseases for Quality Assessment in Korean Medicine by Delphi Method. 2016; 26(3), 129-141.
박창현 and Lim Hyung Ho. "Selection of Manageable Diseases for Quality Assessment in Korean Medicine by Delphi Method" Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation 26, no.3 (2016) : 129-141.
박창현; Lim Hyung Ho. Selection of Manageable Diseases for Quality Assessment in Korean Medicine by Delphi Method. Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation, 26(3), 129-141.
박창현; Lim Hyung Ho. Selection of Manageable Diseases for Quality Assessment in Korean Medicine by Delphi Method. Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation. 2016; 26(3) 129-141.
박창현, Lim Hyung Ho. Selection of Manageable Diseases for Quality Assessment in Korean Medicine by Delphi Method. 2016; 26(3), 129-141.
박창현 and Lim Hyung Ho. "Selection of Manageable Diseases for Quality Assessment in Korean Medicine by Delphi Method" Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation 26, no.3 (2016) : 129-141.