KJCKorea
Journal Central

This study examines research trends in archival information services by analyzing 197 papers published between 2013 and 2024 in 6 major domestic journals in archival studies and library and information science. The analysis categories include laws, systems, and policies; service development and improvement (general, search and browsing, value-added, and utilization-promotion services); service evaluation; and user studies. Findings highlight a notable expansion of field-oriented research and the design of services tailored to diverse user groups, such as college students, older adults, and multicultural families. Studies increasingly integrate advanced information and communication technologies—artificial intelligence (AI), big data, metaverse platforms, chatbots, and augmented reality (AR)—into archival services. Moreover, studies actively discuss legal and ethical concerns, including information disclosure, personal data protection, copyright, and rights such as the right to know and the right to be forgotten. Additionally, research supporting the interpretation and engagement of records, such as content development, exhibitions, education, outreach, and marketing, has expanded, alongside studies on user satisfaction and evaluation indicators. This study comprehensively reviews these trends and proposes directions for the theoretical and practical advancement of domestic archival information services.

This study aims to identify the status and problems of records management in private universities, develop a records disposition schedule through business analysis, and present application cases. The research methods include analysis of domestic and international records management classification systems, collection of feedback from processing departments, and analysis of administrative documents from Y University. The study reviews the concept of university records, the current status of private university records, and the relevant standards and guidelines for the domestic and international records management classification system. It also analyzed surveys, interviews, and administrative documents targeting university processing departments and records management personnel. Based on these findings, a records disposition schedule was developed and applied to the electronic document system document box. Furthermore, a feedback system for the records disposition schedule was established through periodic and regular revisions.

Today, with the development of administrative systems, the number of systems operated by public institutions is also increasing. As these systems proliferate, the method of managing records in the administrative information systems has emerged as an important issue. As of the 2020 EA, about 16,000 administrative systems were in operation at public institutions, and the revision of the Enforcement Decree of the Public Records Management Act in March 2020 provided a legal basis for the records management standards of the administrative information datasets. This study analyzes the process of developing management standard tables for administrative information datasets, as well as their evaluation and disposal, by a records researcher who is not a beneficiary of the National Archives of Korea’s support project among public institutions, focusing particularly on fund management quasi-governmental institutions. Although limited to a single case among 12 fund management quasi-governmental institutions, this study is intended to be helpful for records management research by examining the procedures, evaluation, and disposal of the management standard tables for administrative information datasets from the perspective of practitioners.