KJCKorea
Journal Central

This paper is intended for sentences containing dake after predicates as "Watashi wa kesa koohii o nonda dakeda(I just drank coffeethis morning)". I regard of dakeda as <form related to the modality> that a speaker uses when she/he captures <the content of subject>in a limited way. In this paper, I consider how dakeda is related to other contexts. dakeda means <claim affirming own case> and <implication to deny another case>. And I confirmed that dakeda can not existindependently. It requires the context that is premised. Further, the following was revealed. In dakeda getting involved with othercontexts, <to deny another case> comes to the front. With that, "shortage" and "nuance that is not big deal" come out. In addition,dakeda sometimes denies the premise in the case of premise=another case, and it is sometimes the basis of the premise by denyinganother case in the case of premise≠another case. In any case, we can see <to deny another case> coming to the front.

Dakeda, Limitation, Affirmation of own case, Denial of other cases