본문 바로가기
  • Home

Determinants of the use of the "te morau" statement

  • The Japanese Language Association of Korea
  • Abbr : JLAK
  • 2015, (44), pp.3-21
  • DOI : 10.14817/jlak.2015.44.3
  • Publisher : The Japanese Language Association Of Korea
  • Research Area : Humanities > Japanese Language and Literature

kimeunmo 1

1전북대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

The "te morau" statement has been broadly classified into two types, i.e. causative type "te morau" and "morau" passive. However, there has been one more type of the "te morau" statement which can not be classified as either of these types. Kim-eunmo (2011) classified usages of the “te morau” construction into eight subsets according to who gains benefits by the use of the construction: They are rating noun, request, instruction, authorization, faire, obligation, recommend and destination. Then, in classifying verbs into seven types I revealed that their usage is related to the nature of the verb. In, among the usage is limited by the nature of the verb, its more within one carrying out our implemented as usage, what kind of factors are involved. In this paper, we investigated the factors by which various usages of the "te morau" statement are determined. Furthermore, the reason why the factors are involved is also discussed. Findings are summarized as follows. ① occurring in the main clause "te morau" the succession clause representing the outreach, succession clause representative of a request, by the co-caused reason clause, usage is determined. In the case of verb class that can be carried out along the request act of "te morau" statement, succession clause represents the approach, causes and reasons clause represents the reason for the lobbying, become usage of such request act of a request. ② co-occurrence of adverbs, number of participants, change of case display, by the migration of events meaning due to the nature of the benefit actors, usage is determined. ③ "te mora" occurring in the subordinate clause, due to the influence of the main clause, usage is determined. If you are represented is why the main clause was the requesting act, it becomes usage of such request act of a request. On the other hand, the main clause is non will expressions "te morau", it is simple zyuei when it comes to emotional expression. ④ succession clause, equivalent clause in the cause and reason clause, form different but the succession clause, similar roles and causes and reasons clause of ①. ⑤ "te morau" there is no factor of up to ④ from ① to the statement, just by the context, some by clogging Pragmatics factors, even if the usage is determined. Above, usage of "te morau" statement, it became clear that it is intended to come determined by various factors such as the relationship between the nature and verb complex sentence.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.