@article{ART002507235},
author={Hong Jaebeom},
title={North Korea's Acceptance of the Stanislavski System ―Focusing on the Debate on the Action Analysis Method},
journal={The Journal of Korean drama and theatre},
issn={1225-7729},
year={2019},
number={65},
pages={349-378},
doi={10.17938/tjkdat.2019..65.349}
TY - JOUR
AU - Hong Jaebeom
TI - North Korea's Acceptance of the Stanislavski System ―Focusing on the Debate on the Action Analysis Method
JO - The Journal of Korean drama and theatre
PY - 2019
VL - null
IS - 65
PB - The Learned Society Of Korean Drama And Theatre
SP - 349
EP - 378
SN - 1225-7729
AB - The paper examines the achievements and limitations of the action analysis debate that has taken place between the old actors and the young since the North's theatrical community fully embraced the Stanislavski system. The dispute over how and when to learn the lines at the venue of the performance exercise. The established actors used to practice their acts after completing their accents beyond memorizing their lines at the table practice stage. With the introduction of the system, the mechanical propensity of the lines of established actors became more prominent and action analysis became popular as a way to solve them. However, without recognizing that the internal psychological action analyzed at the table practice cannot be corrected at the actual exercise stage, the subtext set at the table practice merely establishes a mechanical relationship to be implemented as an external physical action in the exercise. These limits mean that the nature of action analysis is mistaken. As Kim Jong-il began to oversee party's literary and artistic policies in the mid-1960s, the Soviet study group that propagated the action analysis method was excluded from the theater scene, and the North Korean play would face a drastic change with the ‘Sunghwangdang’ style Revolutionary Drama, the Stanislavski system would disappear.
KW - Action Analysis Method;Action Practice;Stanislavski System;Subtext;Table Practice
DO - 10.17938/tjkdat.2019..65.349
ER -
Hong Jaebeom. (2019). North Korea's Acceptance of the Stanislavski System ―Focusing on the Debate on the Action Analysis Method. The Journal of Korean drama and theatre, 65, 349-378.
Hong Jaebeom. 2019, "North Korea's Acceptance of the Stanislavski System ―Focusing on the Debate on the Action Analysis Method", The Journal of Korean drama and theatre, no.65, pp.349-378. Available from: doi:10.17938/tjkdat.2019..65.349
Hong Jaebeom "North Korea's Acceptance of the Stanislavski System ―Focusing on the Debate on the Action Analysis Method" The Journal of Korean drama and theatre 65 pp.349-378 (2019) : 349.
Hong Jaebeom. North Korea's Acceptance of the Stanislavski System ―Focusing on the Debate on the Action Analysis Method. 2019; 65 : 349-378. Available from: doi:10.17938/tjkdat.2019..65.349
Hong Jaebeom. "North Korea's Acceptance of the Stanislavski System ―Focusing on the Debate on the Action Analysis Method" The Journal of Korean drama and theatre no.65(2019) : 349-378.doi: 10.17938/tjkdat.2019..65.349
Hong Jaebeom. North Korea's Acceptance of the Stanislavski System ―Focusing on the Debate on the Action Analysis Method. The Journal of Korean drama and theatre, 65, 349-378. doi: 10.17938/tjkdat.2019..65.349
Hong Jaebeom. North Korea's Acceptance of the Stanislavski System ―Focusing on the Debate on the Action Analysis Method. The Journal of Korean drama and theatre. 2019; 65 349-378. doi: 10.17938/tjkdat.2019..65.349
Hong Jaebeom. North Korea's Acceptance of the Stanislavski System ―Focusing on the Debate on the Action Analysis Method. 2019; 65 : 349-378. Available from: doi:10.17938/tjkdat.2019..65.349
Hong Jaebeom. "North Korea's Acceptance of the Stanislavski System ―Focusing on the Debate on the Action Analysis Method" The Journal of Korean drama and theatre no.65(2019) : 349-378.doi: 10.17938/tjkdat.2019..65.349
