2019, Vol.3, No.1

Korea and Global Affairs 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 0.89

pISSN : 2508-8300 / eISSN : 2671-5694
https://journal.kci.go.kr/kips

After the democratization movement in 1987, korean politics was transformed into three kim’s politics by y Kim Yeong-sam, Kim Dae-jung and Kim Jong-pil. Before the time of three kim’s politics, korean politics lasted for one long term, but three kim’s politics made possible the peaceful regime change through political party integration and party coalition. The evaluation of three kim’s politics coexist both positive and negative. The Positive political effects are diversification of political party composition and stabilization of regime change. Three kim’s politics transformed the political party composition of Korea from a two-party system to a multi-party system, made possible a peaceful regime change through the unification of three parties and the DJP coalition. However, the negative political distortions of three kim’s politics are the shortening of political parties and the concentration of political ideology. In three kim’s politics, political party in Korea has a very short life due to the creation of political parties, the dissolution of political parties, the reorganization of political parties and the integration of political parties. Conservatism and progressive tendencies related three kim’s politics were stabilized through Yeongnam region and Honam region. Therefore, three kim’s politics means that the proportion of Korean politics is very high. Political effects and distortions derived from three kim’s politics have become a challenge for Korean politics to overcome.

This paper is to analyze the trend and implications of the publication of China's defense and security white papers. To this end the paper is composed of 5 chapters titled instruction; publication details and composition of China's defense and security white paper; the gist of the white paper on national defense and security during the Chinese president Xi Jinping era; the implications of Chinese white paper on national defense and security during the Chinese president Xi Jinping era; and conclusion. The Chinese Ministry of National Defense had published seven books every two years since 1998 to 2010. In 1995, the ministry published a white paper titled‘China's arms control and disarmament’ for the first time. In 2013, it published a white paper titled ‘The Diversified Employment of China's Armed Forces’ and‘China's Military Strategy’ in 2015. All have the common characteristic of being a propaganda policy reflecting China's strategic calculations. It seems that China has began to publish defense white papers in a proactive manner, due to the following factors: ①pressure on China to demand military transparency from neighboring countries such as the United States; ②the erosion of the‘China threat.’ and ③confidence in the achievement of China's military modernization. The‘active defensive strategy’ and the‘strong defense strategy’ of Si Jinping are implied in the words“China’s dream is a dream of a powerful country and dream of a strong nation is essential to construct a strong nation.”His these strategies have raised security concerns for neighboring countries. We need to maintain and reinforce strong ROK-US security cooperation, and hedging strategies to harmoniously promote ROK-China economic cooperation.

The purpose of this paper is to propose measures to respond to NK's nuclear threat by applying the concept of offset strategy in the US and the fourth industrial revolution technology innovation. Through this study, the concept, technology, and organization were examined to find measures to counter the NK's nuclear threat. The concept was to review the US offset strategy and consider the strategy of paralyzing the enemy's center as an operational concept. And the technologies that can support the 4th Industrial revolution and the 3rd US offset strategy. The organization analyzed the implications for the reform of the National Defense Reform 2.0 and the reorganization of the acquisition of the US DoD. Through the US offset strategy review, it is necessary to reconcile the strategic concepts of Korea and the US, and the interoperability of technologies and the cooperation fields of the ROK-US alliance. In addition, it is necessary to strengthen the capability of responding to NK's nuclear threat in connection with the 4th Industrial Revolution and the National Defense Reform 2.0 promotion. It is necessary to develop the concept of operational performance applying the new paradigm for the NK's nuclear issue and to apply advanced science and technology. And that it is necessary to organize effectively in conjunction with the National Defense Reform 2.0.