@article{ART001807228},
author={Kim Seong Ju},
title={On the Shape of Abridgement of the Hwaeomgyeong Vols.72-80 Collected by Shōsōin},
journal={Journal of Studies in Bibliography},
issn={1225-5246},
year={2013},
number={55},
pages={337-370},
doi={10.17258/jib.2013..55.337}
TY - JOUR
AU - Kim Seong Ju
TI - On the Shape of Abridgement of the Hwaeomgyeong Vols.72-80 Collected by Shōsōin
JO - Journal of Studies in Bibliography
PY - 2013
VL - null
IS - 55
PB - Korean Society of Bibliography
SP - 337
EP - 370
SN - 1225-5246
AB - I have investigated an aspect of the abridgement and other characteristics of the abridged Jubon Hwaeomgyeong vols.72-80 collected in Shōsōin(hereafter, JH; Jeongchangwon Hwaeomgyeong) of Japan. The remainging ratio of JH is 44.2% and that of TH(Tongdaesa Hwaeomgyeong) is 29.4%. And the former’s remaining ratio is, contrary to expectation, higher than that of the other. But this is a matter of course because the editors of JH have put the bigger emphasis on the story of Hwaeomgyeong than the Buddhist doctrines in it.
I think, on the other hand, why the editors of JH have written “what are ten(何等爲十)?” and they have arranged only one or two among them is they always have beared the original text in mind. JH has not been, therefore, a perfect Hwaeomgyeong text in itself but they have always premised an original one.
Above these, I have revealed mistakenly written letters and phrases, dropped parts, and overlapping written letters, etc. through the proof-reading process and have found out two Chinese Characters of Empress Wŭ, 𥠢 and , which we can not see them in other Korean Buddhist literatures. I have, at last, pointed out and corrected the faults among the footnotes in the Jubon Hwaeomgyeong vols. 72-80 of Taishō Tripiṭaka.
KW - the Jeongchangwon Hwaeomgyeong(the Shōsōin Kegonkyou);abridgement;remaining ratio;the Tongdaesa Hwaeomgyeong(the Tōdaiji Kegonkyou);Chinese Characters of Empress Wŭ
DO - 10.17258/jib.2013..55.337
ER -
Kim Seong Ju. (2013). On the Shape of Abridgement of the Hwaeomgyeong Vols.72-80 Collected by Shōsōin. Journal of Studies in Bibliography, 55, 337-370.
Kim Seong Ju. 2013, "On the Shape of Abridgement of the Hwaeomgyeong Vols.72-80 Collected by Shōsōin", Journal of Studies in Bibliography, no.55, pp.337-370. Available from: doi:10.17258/jib.2013..55.337
Kim Seong Ju "On the Shape of Abridgement of the Hwaeomgyeong Vols.72-80 Collected by Shōsōin" Journal of Studies in Bibliography 55 pp.337-370 (2013) : 337.
Kim Seong Ju. On the Shape of Abridgement of the Hwaeomgyeong Vols.72-80 Collected by Shōsōin. 2013; 55 : 337-370. Available from: doi:10.17258/jib.2013..55.337
Kim Seong Ju. "On the Shape of Abridgement of the Hwaeomgyeong Vols.72-80 Collected by Shōsōin" Journal of Studies in Bibliography no.55(2013) : 337-370.doi: 10.17258/jib.2013..55.337
Kim Seong Ju. On the Shape of Abridgement of the Hwaeomgyeong Vols.72-80 Collected by Shōsōin. Journal of Studies in Bibliography, 55, 337-370. doi: 10.17258/jib.2013..55.337
Kim Seong Ju. On the Shape of Abridgement of the Hwaeomgyeong Vols.72-80 Collected by Shōsōin. Journal of Studies in Bibliography. 2013; 55 337-370. doi: 10.17258/jib.2013..55.337
Kim Seong Ju. On the Shape of Abridgement of the Hwaeomgyeong Vols.72-80 Collected by Shōsōin. 2013; 55 : 337-370. Available from: doi:10.17258/jib.2013..55.337
Kim Seong Ju. "On the Shape of Abridgement of the Hwaeomgyeong Vols.72-80 Collected by Shōsōin" Journal of Studies in Bibliography no.55(2013) : 337-370.doi: 10.17258/jib.2013..55.337
