본문 바로가기
  • Home

Study on Compilation of Gukjobogam

  • Journal of Studies in Bibliography
  • Abbr : JSB
  • 2019, (77), pp.287~322
  • DOI : 10.17258/jib.2019..77.287
  • Publisher : Korean Society of Bibliography
  • Research Area : Interdisciplinary Studies > Library and Information Science
  • Received : February 25, 2019
  • Accepted : March 24, 2019

EOM TAEYONG 1 SeungWoon Shin 2

1국립한글박물관 학예연구원
2성균관대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study has analyzed bibliographic pedigree, organization and contents of Gukjobogam (國朝寶鑑), and also examined Sokgukjobogam (續國朝寶鑑). The results are as follows. The bibliographic pedigree of Gukjobogam have been investigated. The literature of Gieun-che (記言體, a style of writing to describe words), which was based on Sangseo (尙書), has been established as a history book by Jeongkwanjeongyo (貞觀政要) compiled in Tang Dynasty and was further compiled consistently as Song and Ming dynasty were continued by Bohun (寶訓). Gukjobogam was compiled by accommodating chinese Gieun-che history books in institutional and ideological manners. The characteristics of each Bogam were examined with regard to the organization and contents. Depending on the differences in forms of expression, Gukjobogam in Jeongjo Dynasty shows high convenience in search and reading compared to the first three Bogam. When it comes to the contents, many articles related to the basic duties of the state and the disciplines of kings were commonly found, and the others had differing subjects that were emphasized according to the compilation period. Most included articles were taken from Sillok, but Yeongjongjobogam (英宗朝寶鑑) holds relatively many articles with no reference from Sillok. Moreover, a total of 17 articles quoting Sokgukjobogam published in Yeonsangun Dynasty, which is a missing book, were found from Anlakdangjip (顏樂堂集) and Sillok (實錄).

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.