본문 바로가기
  • Home

Improved Method for Considering Citation Measures in Evaluating Korean Journals

  • Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management
  • Abbr : JKOSIM
  • 2020, 37(1), pp.197~220
  • DOI : 10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.1.197
  • Publisher : 한국정보관리학회
  • Research Area : Interdisciplinary Studies > Library and Information Science
  • Received : March 5, 2020
  • Accepted : March 10, 2020
  • Published : March 30, 2020

Lee, Jae Yun 1

1명지대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

Recently, the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) announced new plan to reflect the KCI citation measures in journal evaluation. In principle, Journal evaluation should reflect each journals situation and characteristics through various indicators. In this study, three improvement plans were proposed by reviewing the announced journal evaluation plan of NRF. The first improvement is to consider the five-year IF as an additional citation measure; the second improvement is to allow flexible selection of the category level on which to rank journals; and the last improvement is to combine the previous two methods and apply them together. The improvement methods proposed in this study are expected to contribute to minimizing side effects of KCI journal evaluation.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

This paper was written with support from the National Research Foundation of Korea.