Study Design: A retrospective study.
Objectives: To assess the relationship between surgical outcomes and preoperative MRI findings, a retrospective review was conductedon the surgical outcomes depending on the preoperative MRI findings including type of herniation and Modic changes.
Summary of Literature Review: In most reports, the patients that have large disc herniation were expected to have improved surgicaloutcomes. However, there have been controversies regarding the outcomes and Modic changes.
Materials and Methods: The retrospective review was conducted in 82 patients who underwent a discectomy for single level lumbardisc herniation. The average follow-up period was 34.2 months. Among their preoperative baseline MRI measurements, the stage of discherniation, degree of nerve root compression, degree of dural sac compression, and Modic change of vertebral endplate were evaluatedfor the subsequent comparison between the preoperative and postoperative changes and ODI score.
Results: Patients with extrusion or sequestration type showed significant improvements compared to the patients with protrusion typedisc herniation. By degree of nerve root compression, patients with root compression showed significant improvements compared to thepatients who had contact type. The degree of dural sac compression revealed no correlation with changes in the ODI score. 23 of the 82patients, the preoperative MRI showed a Modic change. Compared to the group who did not show such a Modic change, they turned outto be unrelated to the preoperative and postoperative changes in the ODI score.
Conclusion: Patients who had extrusion or sequestration type disc herniation showed a better clinical improvement than protrusiontype. Patients with compression type root lesion showed better clinical improvement than contact type root lesion. No correlation wasnoted regarding the outcomes of the surgical treatment and degree of dural sac compression or Modic changes.