@article{ART001278203},
author={강민수 and 황재성},
title={Radiologic Changes of Adjacent-level after Anterior Cervical Spinal Fusion -Midterm follow-up results},
journal={Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery},
issn={2093-4378},
year={2008},
volume={15},
number={3},
pages={133-139}
TY - JOUR
AU - 강민수
AU - 황재성
TI - Radiologic Changes of Adjacent-level after Anterior Cervical Spinal Fusion -Midterm follow-up results
JO - Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
PY - 2008
VL - 15
IS - 3
PB - Korean Society Of Spine Surgery
SP - 133
EP - 139
SN - 2093-4378
AB - Study Design: We studied the changes of the adjacent-level after performing anterior cervical interbody fusion.
Objectives: We retrospectively analyzed the radiologic changes such as the degenerative changes and osteophyte formation in
the adjacent-level and the affecting factors that affect the changes of the adjacent level after anterior cervical interbody fusion.
Summary of the Literature Review: We studied the patients who were more than sixty years old and who had more degeneration
at the time of operation and who developed symptomatic new disease within the first four years after their procedure.
When the interbody spacer was shortened by 10% to simulate subsidence, the plate lost nearly 70% of its load-sharing capabilities.
Materials and Methods: All the patients were treated with a plate and an autoiliac bone graft. We reviewed the correlation
between the changes in the adjacent level and the factors that included gender, age, the fused segments, the plate-to-disc distance,
the preoperative degenerative changes in the adjacent level, subsidence of the graft bone, the height of the graft bone,
fracture and dislocation, and loosening of the implant.
Results: Radiologic changes in the adjacent-level were seen in 35 cases and these cases included 27 cases in the upper level and
17 cases in lower level. Adjacent level changes were seen in 27 of the 37 (73%) patient who were above 50 years old. Adjacent
level changes were seen in 19 (90.5%) of the 21 cases that had preoperative cephalad level degeneration, and adjacent level
changes were seen in 9 (81.8%) of the 11 cases that had preoperative caudal degeneration. Adjacent level degeneration developed
or increased in the cases of subsidence of a graft over 2 mm.
Conclusions: The patients who undergo anterior cervical interbody fusion need to be continuously followed up because radiologic
changes can increase in the case with degenerative change in the adjacent segment and subsidence of the bone graft of
more than 2 mm.
KW -
DO -
UR -
ER -
강민수 and 황재성. (2008). Radiologic Changes of Adjacent-level after Anterior Cervical Spinal Fusion -Midterm follow-up results. Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery, 15(3), 133-139.
강민수 and 황재성. 2008, "Radiologic Changes of Adjacent-level after Anterior Cervical Spinal Fusion -Midterm follow-up results", Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery, vol.15, no.3 pp.133-139.
강민수, 황재성 "Radiologic Changes of Adjacent-level after Anterior Cervical Spinal Fusion -Midterm follow-up results" Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery 15.3 pp.133-139 (2008) : 133.
강민수, 황재성. Radiologic Changes of Adjacent-level after Anterior Cervical Spinal Fusion -Midterm follow-up results. 2008; 15(3), 133-139.
강민수 and 황재성. "Radiologic Changes of Adjacent-level after Anterior Cervical Spinal Fusion -Midterm follow-up results" Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery 15, no.3 (2008) : 133-139.
강민수; 황재성. Radiologic Changes of Adjacent-level after Anterior Cervical Spinal Fusion -Midterm follow-up results. Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery, 15(3), 133-139.
강민수; 황재성. Radiologic Changes of Adjacent-level after Anterior Cervical Spinal Fusion -Midterm follow-up results. Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery. 2008; 15(3) 133-139.
강민수, 황재성. Radiologic Changes of Adjacent-level after Anterior Cervical Spinal Fusion -Midterm follow-up results. 2008; 15(3), 133-139.
강민수 and 황재성. "Radiologic Changes of Adjacent-level after Anterior Cervical Spinal Fusion -Midterm follow-up results" Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery 15, no.3 (2008) : 133-139.