@article{ART001327800},
author={이재철 and SOH JAE WAN and 조주형 and 김연일 and 신병준},
title={Comparative Analysis of Surgical Options in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Kyphosis},
journal={Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery},
issn={2093-4378},
year={2009},
volume={16},
number={1},
pages={8-16}
TY - JOUR
AU - 이재철
AU - SOH JAE WAN
AU - 조주형
AU - 김연일
AU - 신병준
TI - Comparative Analysis of Surgical Options in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Kyphosis
JO - Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
PY - 2009
VL - 16
IS - 1
PB - Korean Society Of Spine Surgery
SP - 8
EP - 16
SN - 2093-4378
AB - Study Design: A retrospective study
Objectives: To compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of three surgical methods
Summary of literature Review: There were many proposed surgical treatments for lumbar degenerative kyphosis but the best
treatment is still controversial.
Materials and Methods: Thirty three patients (all female) had undergone surgery. The mean age at surgery was 61.2. The average
follow-up period was 34.7 months. The patients were divided into three groups. Group A included 7 cases with a correction
by a posterior osteotomy, Group B included 15 with a posterior correction without an osteotomy, and Group C included 11 with
combined anterior-posterior surgery. The radiographic measurements of lumbar lordosis, upper lumbar lordosis, lower lumbar
lordosis, and pelvic tilt were performed before surgery, after surgery, and at the final follow-up visit. The loss of correction,
complication rates and the clinical results were also compared.
Results: Postoperative correction of the lumbar and lower lumbar lordosis were significantly higher in group A and C than
group B. The correction of upper lumbar lordosis was significantly higher in group A than group C. On the final follow-up,
there was no significant difference in the loss of correction and clinical results between the three groups. The number of cases
with complications in groups A, B and C was 4 (57%), 2 (13.3%) and 2 (18.2%), respectively. Two patients in group A required
additional surgery.
Conclusions: Groups A and C were more effective than posterior-only correction. There was no significant difference in the
clinical results between the three groups but complication rate was higher in Group A than the other groups. Combined anterior
and posterior surgery can be a safe and effective method for correction.
KW - LDK;Osteotomy;Posterior correction without osteotomy;Combined anterior-posterior surgery
DO -
UR -
ER -
이재철, SOH JAE WAN, 조주형, 김연일 and 신병준. (2009). Comparative Analysis of Surgical Options in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Kyphosis. Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery, 16(1), 8-16.
이재철, SOH JAE WAN, 조주형, 김연일 and 신병준. 2009, "Comparative Analysis of Surgical Options in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Kyphosis", Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery, vol.16, no.1 pp.8-16.
이재철, SOH JAE WAN, 조주형, 김연일, 신병준 "Comparative Analysis of Surgical Options in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Kyphosis" Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery 16.1 pp.8-16 (2009) : 8.
이재철, SOH JAE WAN, 조주형, 김연일, 신병준. Comparative Analysis of Surgical Options in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Kyphosis. 2009; 16(1), 8-16.
이재철, SOH JAE WAN, 조주형, 김연일 and 신병준. "Comparative Analysis of Surgical Options in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Kyphosis" Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery 16, no.1 (2009) : 8-16.
이재철; SOH JAE WAN; 조주형; 김연일; 신병준. Comparative Analysis of Surgical Options in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Kyphosis. Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery, 16(1), 8-16.
이재철; SOH JAE WAN; 조주형; 김연일; 신병준. Comparative Analysis of Surgical Options in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Kyphosis. Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery. 2009; 16(1) 8-16.
이재철, SOH JAE WAN, 조주형, 김연일, 신병준. Comparative Analysis of Surgical Options in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Kyphosis. 2009; 16(1), 8-16.
이재철, SOH JAE WAN, 조주형, 김연일 and 신병준. "Comparative Analysis of Surgical Options in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Kyphosis" Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery 16, no.1 (2009) : 8-16.