@article{ART002288913},
author={Jang Ho Young and Lee Jeong-Hoon and lee suk-min},
title={The Analysis on the Reliability and Validity of Korean-Version Balance Assessment Tools},
journal={Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine},
issn={1975-311X},
year={2017},
volume={12},
number={4},
pages={139-146}
TY - JOUR
AU - Jang Ho Young
AU - Lee Jeong-Hoon
AU - lee suk-min
TI - The Analysis on the Reliability and Validity of Korean-Version Balance Assessment Tools
JO - Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine
PY - 2017
VL - 12
IS - 4
PB - The Korean Society of Physical Medicine
SP - 139
EP - 146
SN - 1975-311X
AB - PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to systematically analyze the reliability and validity of the Korean-version of the balance assessment tools.
METHODS: Two reviewers of this study independently evaluated the titles of articles and abstracts of studies published until December 2016 through electronic databases (RISS, NDSL, KISS, DBpia) using the keywords “Balance or posture or postural control or postural stability”, “Test or assessment or measurement or outcome measure or assessment tool or measurement tool”, “Korean version”, “Reliability” and “Validity”. Regarding the questions considered suitable for the purpose of this study, consensus was reached after reading the full text. Selecting journals suitable for the purpose of the study, they were analyzed as data.
RESULTS: The reviewers selected nine papers suitable for the purpose of this study, and Korean-version of the balance assessment tools, included the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale, Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS), Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), Falls Efficacy Scale (FES), Tinetti-Balance scale, Fullerton Advanced Balance (FAB) scale, and Function In Sitting Test (FIST). Our study showed that the reliability and validity of the Korean-version of the balance assessment tools were high.
CONCLUSION: The Korean-version of the balance assessment tools with high reliability and validity would enable physical therapists to make a more accurate evaluation of balance.
KW - Assessment;Balance;Reliability;Tool;Validity
DO -
UR -
ER -
Jang Ho Young, Lee Jeong-Hoon and lee suk-min. (2017). The Analysis on the Reliability and Validity of Korean-Version Balance Assessment Tools. Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine, 12(4), 139-146.
Jang Ho Young, Lee Jeong-Hoon and lee suk-min. 2017, "The Analysis on the Reliability and Validity of Korean-Version Balance Assessment Tools", Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine, vol.12, no.4 pp.139-146.
Jang Ho Young, Lee Jeong-Hoon, lee suk-min "The Analysis on the Reliability and Validity of Korean-Version Balance Assessment Tools" Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine 12.4 pp.139-146 (2017) : 139.
Jang Ho Young, Lee Jeong-Hoon, lee suk-min. The Analysis on the Reliability and Validity of Korean-Version Balance Assessment Tools. 2017; 12(4), 139-146.
Jang Ho Young, Lee Jeong-Hoon and lee suk-min. "The Analysis on the Reliability and Validity of Korean-Version Balance Assessment Tools" Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine 12, no.4 (2017) : 139-146.
Jang Ho Young; Lee Jeong-Hoon; lee suk-min. The Analysis on the Reliability and Validity of Korean-Version Balance Assessment Tools. Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine, 12(4), 139-146.
Jang Ho Young; Lee Jeong-Hoon; lee suk-min. The Analysis on the Reliability and Validity of Korean-Version Balance Assessment Tools. Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine. 2017; 12(4) 139-146.
Jang Ho Young, Lee Jeong-Hoon, lee suk-min. The Analysis on the Reliability and Validity of Korean-Version Balance Assessment Tools. 2017; 12(4), 139-146.
Jang Ho Young, Lee Jeong-Hoon and lee suk-min. "The Analysis on the Reliability and Validity of Korean-Version Balance Assessment Tools" Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine 12, no.4 (2017) : 139-146.
