본문 바로가기
  • Home

Nussbaum’s Disgust Skepticism

Ko Hyun-Bum 1

1부산외국어대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

In contemporary moral philosophy, moral emotions, e.g. sympathy, compassion, indignation, are newly illuminated. But discussions about disgust as strong aversion relatively come short. Based on Rozin’s social psychological and Miller’s social constructivist studies on disgust, Nussbaum criticizes the emotion fiercely. Nussbaum’s study of disgust lies on her persistent investigation of emotion, on the other hand against the backdrop of hot social issues. On the critique of disgust, Nussbaum as a philosopher of law, tries to examine more concrete sentences. In this article, I examine the validity of her claim in the light of philosophy of emotion and moral philosophy. On cognitivist view which defines emotion as appraisal, Nussbaum claims the appropriateness of moral emotion. But Nussbaum doesn’t approve disgust. For she thinks disgust is based on the thought of negation of human’s animality and finiteness and obsessed by normality, so the emotion threatens the value of equal respect and human dignity. Then, is disgust the threat to the humanity? This article examines objections in the perspective of philosophy of emotion and moral philosophy. This article intends to propose that Nussbaum’s critique is more persuasive than objections.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.