@article{ART003258026},
author={Carey Park},
title={A New Pedagogical Approach to Peace, Unification, and Democratic Citizenship Education: Applying David Bohm’s Dialogue and Brenda Morrison’s Restorative Justice Model},
journal={Analyses & Alternatives},
issn={2508-822X},
year={2025},
volume={9},
number={3},
pages={133-162},
doi={10.22931/aanda.2025.9.3.006}
TY - JOUR
AU - Carey Park
TI - A New Pedagogical Approach to Peace, Unification, and Democratic Citizenship Education: Applying David Bohm’s Dialogue and Brenda Morrison’s Restorative Justice Model
JO - Analyses & Alternatives
PY - 2025
VL - 9
IS - 3
PB - Korea Consensus Institute
SP - 133
EP - 162
SN - 2508-822X
AB - This study proposes an integrated pedagogical framework for peace, unification, and democratic citizenship education on the Korean Peninsula by synthesizing David Bohm’s *dialogue theory* and Brenda Morrison’s *whole-school restorative justice model*. Whereas traditional unification education has focused on normative or knowledge-based approaches, this study emphasizes strengthening civic competencies to mediate social conflicts. Bohm’s dialogue theory—centered on the suspension of judgment, revealing tacit assumptions, and creating shared meaning—cultivates democratic dialogue skills, while Morrison’s model—featuring responsive regulation and restorative processes—fosters collective democratic resilience within school communities. Integrating these approaches, the paper presents a practical instructional design applicable across classrooms, schools, and communities. Ultimately, it reframes peace, unification, and citizenship education as an integrated practice that promotes learning ‘peace as a process’ rather than pursuing ‘unification as an end.’
KW - Dialogue Theory;Restorative Justice;Peace Education;Unification Education;Democratic Citizenship Education
DO - 10.22931/aanda.2025.9.3.006
ER -
Carey Park. (2025). A New Pedagogical Approach to Peace, Unification, and Democratic Citizenship Education: Applying David Bohm’s Dialogue and Brenda Morrison’s Restorative Justice Model. Analyses & Alternatives, 9(3), 133-162.
Carey Park. 2025, "A New Pedagogical Approach to Peace, Unification, and Democratic Citizenship Education: Applying David Bohm’s Dialogue and Brenda Morrison’s Restorative Justice Model", Analyses & Alternatives, vol.9, no.3 pp.133-162. Available from: doi:10.22931/aanda.2025.9.3.006
Carey Park "A New Pedagogical Approach to Peace, Unification, and Democratic Citizenship Education: Applying David Bohm’s Dialogue and Brenda Morrison’s Restorative Justice Model" Analyses & Alternatives 9.3 pp.133-162 (2025) : 133.
Carey Park. A New Pedagogical Approach to Peace, Unification, and Democratic Citizenship Education: Applying David Bohm’s Dialogue and Brenda Morrison’s Restorative Justice Model. 2025; 9(3), 133-162. Available from: doi:10.22931/aanda.2025.9.3.006
Carey Park. "A New Pedagogical Approach to Peace, Unification, and Democratic Citizenship Education: Applying David Bohm’s Dialogue and Brenda Morrison’s Restorative Justice Model" Analyses & Alternatives 9, no.3 (2025) : 133-162.doi: 10.22931/aanda.2025.9.3.006
Carey Park. A New Pedagogical Approach to Peace, Unification, and Democratic Citizenship Education: Applying David Bohm’s Dialogue and Brenda Morrison’s Restorative Justice Model. Analyses & Alternatives, 9(3), 133-162. doi: 10.22931/aanda.2025.9.3.006
Carey Park. A New Pedagogical Approach to Peace, Unification, and Democratic Citizenship Education: Applying David Bohm’s Dialogue and Brenda Morrison’s Restorative Justice Model. Analyses & Alternatives. 2025; 9(3) 133-162. doi: 10.22931/aanda.2025.9.3.006
Carey Park. A New Pedagogical Approach to Peace, Unification, and Democratic Citizenship Education: Applying David Bohm’s Dialogue and Brenda Morrison’s Restorative Justice Model. 2025; 9(3), 133-162. Available from: doi:10.22931/aanda.2025.9.3.006
Carey Park. "A New Pedagogical Approach to Peace, Unification, and Democratic Citizenship Education: Applying David Bohm’s Dialogue and Brenda Morrison’s Restorative Justice Model" Analyses & Alternatives 9, no.3 (2025) : 133-162.doi: 10.22931/aanda.2025.9.3.006
