@article{ART001673577},
author={HUI-TEAK KIM},
title={Textual communication and its model},
journal={Cross-Cultural Studies},
issn={1598-0685},
year={2012},
volume={27},
pages={347-386},
doi={10.21049/ccs.2012.27..347}
TY - JOUR
AU - HUI-TEAK KIM
TI - Textual communication and its model
JO - Cross-Cultural Studies
PY - 2012
VL - 27
IS - null
PB - Center for Cross Culture Studies
SP - 347
EP - 386
SN - 1598-0685
AB - This article aims to establish the model of textual communication and its schema. To do this, we must identify the characteristics of textual communication, different from that of the oral, because the model of communication is usually done to show the structure of oral communication. Moreover, we must clarify the status text as ‘énoncé’, that is to say product of the act of enunciation. The study of the text has now reached to achieve from the perspective of pragmatics, overcoming the structural point of view that dominates long text linguistics. And now, we need to enrich the theoretical basis of the pragmatics of text. Then the search of elements necessary to develop the model and pattern of textual communication can help to establish the elements used to form the theoretical basis.
To clarify the characteristics of textual communication, we needed to explain the present communication by the position of reader and the point of view of textual reference. The schema that we proposed is not perfect, but there are still issues to think to complete it. For example, one must take into account the plurality of readers and reflect the relationship between interpretive texts in this schema, etc. This kind of problem is not only required to complete the schema but also to strengthen the basis of the theory of textual communication and the pragmatics of text.
KW - text;reader;author;model of textual communication;schema
DO - 10.21049/ccs.2012.27..347
ER -
HUI-TEAK KIM. (2012). Textual communication and its model. Cross-Cultural Studies, 27, 347-386.
HUI-TEAK KIM. 2012, "Textual communication and its model", Cross-Cultural Studies, vol.27, pp.347-386. Available from: doi:10.21049/ccs.2012.27..347
HUI-TEAK KIM "Textual communication and its model" Cross-Cultural Studies 27 pp.347-386 (2012) : 347.
HUI-TEAK KIM. Textual communication and its model. 2012; 27 347-386. Available from: doi:10.21049/ccs.2012.27..347
HUI-TEAK KIM. "Textual communication and its model" Cross-Cultural Studies 27(2012) : 347-386.doi: 10.21049/ccs.2012.27..347
HUI-TEAK KIM. Textual communication and its model. Cross-Cultural Studies, 27, 347-386. doi: 10.21049/ccs.2012.27..347
HUI-TEAK KIM. Textual communication and its model. Cross-Cultural Studies. 2012; 27 347-386. doi: 10.21049/ccs.2012.27..347
HUI-TEAK KIM. Textual communication and its model. 2012; 27 347-386. Available from: doi:10.21049/ccs.2012.27..347
HUI-TEAK KIM. "Textual communication and its model" Cross-Cultural Studies 27(2012) : 347-386.doi: 10.21049/ccs.2012.27..347
