@article{ART002294670},
author={Hansaem Kim and Bae， Mi-yeon},
title={Study on the Use of Objectification Strategy in Academic Writing},
journal={Cross-Cultural Studies},
issn={1598-0685},
year={2017},
volume={49},
pages={95-126},
doi={10.21049/ccs.2017.49..95}
TY - JOUR
AU - Hansaem Kim
AU - Bae， Mi-yeon
TI - Study on the Use of Objectification Strategy in Academic Writing
JO - Cross-Cultural Studies
PY - 2017
VL - 49
IS - null
PB - Center for Cross Culture Studies
SP - 95
EP - 126
SN - 1598-0685
AB - The purpose of this paper is to compare learners' academic texts with academic texts of native speakers and to examine the usage patterns of learners' objectification strategies in detail. In order to achieve objectivity as a discourse mechanism applied to describe the results of academic inquiry in a scientific way with universality and validity, we analyzed concepts and signs such as related intentionality, accuracy, and mitigation of the linguistic markers of objectification strategies. As a result of the comparison, it was analyzed that there are intersectional overlaps with the signs that reveal objectivity, signs indicating related mechanisms, and there is a different set that is differentiated. Objective markers can be broadly classified as emphasizing stativity of research results, separating research subjects from research results, and generalizing research contents. Sustainable expressions and noun phrases emphasize statehood, and non-inhabited expressions, passive expressions, and self-quotations are maintained in the distance between the claimant and the writer, and the pluralization through first-person pronouns and suffixes contributes to generalization.
In the case of the learner, the non-inhuman expression of the quotation type appears to be very less compared to the maw speaker, which could be due to the lack of recognition of the citation method of the Korean academic text. Next, in the generalization of the research contents, the expression of 'we' was very less compared to the maw speakers.
KW - Korean learners for academic purpose;learner corpus;objectivity;objectification;academic text
DO - 10.21049/ccs.2017.49..95
ER -
Hansaem Kim and Bae， Mi-yeon. (2017). Study on the Use of Objectification Strategy in Academic Writing. Cross-Cultural Studies, 49, 95-126.
Hansaem Kim and Bae， Mi-yeon. 2017, "Study on the Use of Objectification Strategy in Academic Writing", Cross-Cultural Studies, vol.49, pp.95-126. Available from: doi:10.21049/ccs.2017.49..95
Hansaem Kim, Bae， Mi-yeon "Study on the Use of Objectification Strategy in Academic Writing" Cross-Cultural Studies 49 pp.95-126 (2017) : 95.
Hansaem Kim, Bae， Mi-yeon. Study on the Use of Objectification Strategy in Academic Writing. 2017; 49 95-126. Available from: doi:10.21049/ccs.2017.49..95
Hansaem Kim and Bae， Mi-yeon. "Study on the Use of Objectification Strategy in Academic Writing" Cross-Cultural Studies 49(2017) : 95-126.doi: 10.21049/ccs.2017.49..95
Hansaem Kim; Bae， Mi-yeon. Study on the Use of Objectification Strategy in Academic Writing. Cross-Cultural Studies, 49, 95-126. doi: 10.21049/ccs.2017.49..95
Hansaem Kim; Bae， Mi-yeon. Study on the Use of Objectification Strategy in Academic Writing. Cross-Cultural Studies. 2017; 49 95-126. doi: 10.21049/ccs.2017.49..95
Hansaem Kim, Bae， Mi-yeon. Study on the Use of Objectification Strategy in Academic Writing. 2017; 49 95-126. Available from: doi:10.21049/ccs.2017.49..95
Hansaem Kim and Bae， Mi-yeon. "Study on the Use of Objectification Strategy in Academic Writing" Cross-Cultural Studies 49(2017) : 95-126.doi: 10.21049/ccs.2017.49..95
