KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART002572993},
author={Sun, Fangyuan and Hansaem Kim},
title={A Comparative Study of the Chinese ‘在’ and the Korean Counterpart},
journal={Cross-Cultural Studies},
issn={1598-0685},
year={2020},
volume={58},
pages={79-100},
doi={10.21049/ccs.2020.58..79}

TY - JOUR
AU - Sun, Fangyuan
AU - Hansaem Kim
TI - A Comparative Study of the Chinese ‘在’ and the Korean Counterpart
JO - Cross-Cultural Studies
PY - 2020
VL - 58
IS - null
PB - Center for Cross Culture Studies
SP - 79
EP - 100
SN - 1598-0685
AB - The purpose of this paper is to analyze the Korean counterparts of the modern Chinese ‘在’ that appeared in the parallel corpus of the 21st century Sejong Project to reveal the difference between meaning and scope of use. The most important part of the modern Chinese ‘在’ is a means of forming meaning, occupying an important and special position in the Chinese grammar system, similar to the Korean particle, but with many differences. Chinese preposition cannot be a sentence component alone, and must be used together with other parts of speech to serve as a formula or supplement. In the sentence, ‘在’ is mainly combined with words indicating the meaning of time, range, direction, and status as well as the words that indicate the meaning of location. In this paper, we looked at the concept of Chinese preposition and analyzed the meaning of ‘在’ based on information of dictionary and prior research. In addition, based on the parallel corpus of the 21st century Sejong Project, we analyzed the Chinese sentence containing ‘在’ and the corresponding Korean sentence to compare each part of speech and meaning. This contrasting analysis has educational significance that contributes to reducing errors in usage of Korean particle by Chinese Korean learners.
KW - Contrastive analysis;Chinese-Korean Comparative Study;Parallel Corpus;Preposition;Particle
DO - 10.21049/ccs.2020.58..79
ER -

Sun, Fangyuan and Hansaem Kim. (2020). A Comparative Study of the Chinese ‘在’ and the Korean Counterpart. Cross-Cultural Studies, 58, 79-100.

Sun, Fangyuan and Hansaem Kim. 2020, "A Comparative Study of the Chinese ‘在’ and the Korean Counterpart", Cross-Cultural Studies, vol.58, pp.79-100. Available from: doi:10.21049/ccs.2020.58..79

Sun, Fangyuan, Hansaem Kim "A Comparative Study of the Chinese ‘在’ and the Korean Counterpart" Cross-Cultural Studies 58 pp.79-100 (2020) : 79.

Sun, Fangyuan, Hansaem Kim. A Comparative Study of the Chinese ‘在’ and the Korean Counterpart. 2020; 58 79-100. Available from: doi:10.21049/ccs.2020.58..79

Sun, Fangyuan and Hansaem Kim. "A Comparative Study of the Chinese ‘在’ and the Korean Counterpart" Cross-Cultural Studies 58(2020) : 79-100.doi: 10.21049/ccs.2020.58..79

Sun, Fangyuan; Hansaem Kim. A Comparative Study of the Chinese ‘在’ and the Korean Counterpart. Cross-Cultural Studies, 58, 79-100. doi: 10.21049/ccs.2020.58..79

Sun, Fangyuan; Hansaem Kim. A Comparative Study of the Chinese ‘在’ and the Korean Counterpart. Cross-Cultural Studies. 2020; 58 79-100. doi: 10.21049/ccs.2020.58..79

Sun, Fangyuan, Hansaem Kim. A Comparative Study of the Chinese ‘在’ and the Korean Counterpart. 2020; 58 79-100. Available from: doi:10.21049/ccs.2020.58..79

Sun, Fangyuan and Hansaem Kim. "A Comparative Study of the Chinese ‘在’ and the Korean Counterpart" Cross-Cultural Studies 58(2020) : 79-100.doi: 10.21049/ccs.2020.58..79