본문 바로가기
  • Home

Care as the Frontline of Value Regimes: The Political Economy of Care in the Planetary Capitalocene

  • Cross-Cultural Studies
  • 2026, 77(), pp.479~511
  • Publisher : Center for Cross Culture Studies
  • Research Area : Humanities > Literature
  • Received : January 4, 2026
  • Accepted : February 9, 2026
  • Published : February 28, 2026

Yong Taek Jeong 1

1경희대학교(국제캠퍼스) 비교문화연구소

Accredited

ABSTRACT

The main arguments of this study are as follows. First, the planetary Capitalocene is not merely an era in which capitalism has expanded to a global scale, but a field of conflict where Capital’s universal history (History 1) and plural histories (History 2s), constituted by the politics of human and non-human attribution, constantly interrupt and disturb each other’s narratives. Second, care is located at the most radical point of collision in this field of conflict, that is, the “frontline of value regimes.” It constitutes the socio-ontological foundation upon which capital’s world-ecology inevitably relies, even while being systematically devalued by the law of value. Third, therefore, the political economy of care is not simply an ethical appeal to recognize the value of care labor, but a civilizational task to transform the capitalist value regime itself and to seek a new planetary social contract. Fourth, this task requires Marxism to recover its socio-ontological foundation—a humanistic interest in the life activity conditions of humans and nature—and to restart as a critical theory that places care, dependency, and life maintenance at the center, moving beyond the narrow economic categories of “production/labor.” Through these arguments, this study aims to make three academic contributions. First, it attempts a new synthesis crossing Marxism, feminism, and postcolonial theory by expanding the Capitalocene discussion to the dimension of planetarity and re-establishing the theoretical status of care via Dipesh Chakrabarty’s concept of History 2. Second, by applying Don Kalb’s concept of “value regime” to care studies, it reveals that care is not merely a sub-category of reproduction but the core of political issues where the law of value and moral economy collide. Third, it presents a new starting point for Marxist critical theory by re-illuminating Marx’s socio-ontological presuppositions via the recent works of Søren Mau and Kenneth Knowlton Jr., and positioning care as the core of such presuppositions. Ultimately, this study intends to ground the political economy of care as a theoretical and normative resource that enables the imagination of alternative social forms in the era of planetary crisis.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.

This paper was written with support from the National Research Foundation of Korea.