@article{ART002290868},
author={Ho Jung Kim},
title={An Analysis of Crisis Management Strategy and Relative Damage in South Korea in Response to North Korea’s Direct Military Provocation},
journal={Crisisonomy},
issn={2466-1198},
year={2017},
volume={13},
number={11},
pages={181-194},
doi={10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.11.181}
TY - JOUR
AU - Ho Jung Kim
TI - An Analysis of Crisis Management Strategy and Relative Damage in South Korea in Response to North Korea’s Direct Military Provocation
JO - Crisisonomy
PY - 2017
VL - 13
IS - 11
PB - Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis
SP - 181
EP - 194
SN - 2466-1198
AB - This study analyzed how the South Korean government applied a crisis management strategy to handle the direct military provocation of North Korea. It also compared the relative damage caused by the military crisis management strategies. It is found that, during North Korea’s military provocations, the South Korean government applied an offensive or defensive crisis management strategy in both military and non-military fields to prevent the crisis from spreading further. In addition, the South Korean government had fewer damages than North Korea when it used military offensive and defensive crisis management strategies. Therefore, in order to prevent the provocation from developing into an extreme crisis like war, it is necessary for the South Korean government to pursue a crisis management strategy by applying various methods in military, politics, diplomacy, economy and other non-military fields.
KW - crisis management strategy;offensive crisis management strategies;defensive crisis management strategies
DO - 10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.11.181
ER -
Ho Jung Kim. (2017). An Analysis of Crisis Management Strategy and Relative Damage in South Korea in Response to North Korea’s Direct Military Provocation. Crisisonomy, 13(11), 181-194.
Ho Jung Kim. 2017, "An Analysis of Crisis Management Strategy and Relative Damage in South Korea in Response to North Korea’s Direct Military Provocation", Crisisonomy, vol.13, no.11 pp.181-194. Available from: doi:10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.11.181
Ho Jung Kim "An Analysis of Crisis Management Strategy and Relative Damage in South Korea in Response to North Korea’s Direct Military Provocation" Crisisonomy 13.11 pp.181-194 (2017) : 181.
Ho Jung Kim. An Analysis of Crisis Management Strategy and Relative Damage in South Korea in Response to North Korea’s Direct Military Provocation. 2017; 13(11), 181-194. Available from: doi:10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.11.181
Ho Jung Kim. "An Analysis of Crisis Management Strategy and Relative Damage in South Korea in Response to North Korea’s Direct Military Provocation" Crisisonomy 13, no.11 (2017) : 181-194.doi: 10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.11.181
Ho Jung Kim. An Analysis of Crisis Management Strategy and Relative Damage in South Korea in Response to North Korea’s Direct Military Provocation. Crisisonomy, 13(11), 181-194. doi: 10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.11.181
Ho Jung Kim. An Analysis of Crisis Management Strategy and Relative Damage in South Korea in Response to North Korea’s Direct Military Provocation. Crisisonomy. 2017; 13(11) 181-194. doi: 10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.11.181
Ho Jung Kim. An Analysis of Crisis Management Strategy and Relative Damage in South Korea in Response to North Korea’s Direct Military Provocation. 2017; 13(11), 181-194. Available from: doi:10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.11.181
Ho Jung Kim. "An Analysis of Crisis Management Strategy and Relative Damage in South Korea in Response to North Korea’s Direct Military Provocation" Crisisonomy 13, no.11 (2017) : 181-194.doi: 10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.11.181