@article{ART001751185},
author={In Hyo Seol},
title={UnitedStatesArmyReform intheearly20thCentury: StalemateandRegressionPeriod(1904-1909)},
journal={military history},
issn={1598-317X},
year={2013},
number={86},
pages={157-197},
doi={10.29212/mh.2013..86.157}
TY - JOUR
AU - In Hyo Seol
TI - UnitedStatesArmyReform intheearly20thCentury: StalemateandRegressionPeriod(1904-1909)
JO - military history
PY - 2013
VL - null
IS - 86
PB - Military History Institute, MND
SP - 157
EP - 197
SN - 1598-317X
AB - United States had had unique tradition of supporting local volunteer militia and avoiding large scale standing army.‘The Anti-Military Tradition’had prevailed since colonial time till the early 20th century. After experiencing the record increase in economic power and population, United States had changed in large scale in all aspects, and it finally turned from ‘the isolation of the agricultural republic’ to become‘ an empire true to the name’ especially after the advent of Mckinley administration and Spanish American War. United States Army Reform became possible when the new political groups who recognized the new status of their country cooperated with the reform minded officer corps having been raised after the Civil War.
Although the reform between 1899 and 1903 had accomplished a set of institutional changes which had been impossible before for almost 100years, it was the results of a series of heavy compromises with opposing groups, so it had many limits and problems influencing the following implementation period.The period from 1904 to 1909 was recorded as a period of‘stalemate and regression’.
First of all the reform had itsown vulnerabilityandlimitation resulting from much compromises.Second,the reform group was not fully formed enough to support the implementation of the reform. Finally and most importantly, the opposition against the reform was consistently high because the long tradition still persisted. Under these circumstances, reform was stagnantand regressed in all areas including there gulararmy and general staffr eform, and the national guard reform. Consequently, the stalemate and regression period of US Army Reform in the early 20th century shows well the difficulties of implementation of reform especially when the strong tradition against reform exists in one society.
KW - United States Army;Army reform;United States General Staff;National Guard;Implementation of reform.delay do reform;retreat of reform;Root Reform;United States Army in the early 20th Century;Ainsworth
DO - 10.29212/mh.2013..86.157
ER -
In Hyo Seol. (2013). UnitedStatesArmyReform intheearly20thCentury: StalemateandRegressionPeriod(1904-1909). military history, 86, 157-197.
In Hyo Seol. 2013, "UnitedStatesArmyReform intheearly20thCentury: StalemateandRegressionPeriod(1904-1909)", military history, no.86, pp.157-197. Available from: doi:10.29212/mh.2013..86.157
In Hyo Seol "UnitedStatesArmyReform intheearly20thCentury: StalemateandRegressionPeriod(1904-1909)" military history 86 pp.157-197 (2013) : 157.
In Hyo Seol. UnitedStatesArmyReform intheearly20thCentury: StalemateandRegressionPeriod(1904-1909). 2013; 86 : 157-197. Available from: doi:10.29212/mh.2013..86.157
In Hyo Seol. "UnitedStatesArmyReform intheearly20thCentury: StalemateandRegressionPeriod(1904-1909)" military history no.86(2013) : 157-197.doi: 10.29212/mh.2013..86.157
In Hyo Seol. UnitedStatesArmyReform intheearly20thCentury: StalemateandRegressionPeriod(1904-1909). military history, 86, 157-197. doi: 10.29212/mh.2013..86.157
In Hyo Seol. UnitedStatesArmyReform intheearly20thCentury: StalemateandRegressionPeriod(1904-1909). military history. 2013; 86 157-197. doi: 10.29212/mh.2013..86.157
In Hyo Seol. UnitedStatesArmyReform intheearly20thCentury: StalemateandRegressionPeriod(1904-1909). 2013; 86 : 157-197. Available from: doi:10.29212/mh.2013..86.157
In Hyo Seol. "UnitedStatesArmyReform intheearly20thCentury: StalemateandRegressionPeriod(1904-1909)" military history no.86(2013) : 157-197.doi: 10.29212/mh.2013..86.157