본문 바로가기
  • Home

A Relationship between Daejeongshinsudaejanggyung and Tripitaka Koreana

Yoo Boo hyeon 1

1대진대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study investigates the relationship between Daejeongjang and Jaejojang which have been controversial recently. That is to say, it shows the role of Jaejojang, jeobon of Daejeongjang, by analysing the concerning materials. The results are as in the following. When Chukswaejang was published as a printed book, it took Jaejojang as an ‘original text’ superficially, but the ‘myungbon’ which had been generally corrected on the basis of Jaejojang adopted as an ‘original text’ was used as a real published text. In addition, although the ‘jeobon’ of Daejeongjang was Jaejojang, the ‘original book’ was the bingajangbon when Daejeongjang was published. Therefore it is considered that Jaejojang played a role as an ‘original text’ like the case of Chukswaejang regarding Daejeongjang. In other words, Chukswaejang and Daejeongjang made Hwangbyukjang and Bingajang as a “published text” respectively. In the light of the original, however, the original of Jaejojang not Hwangbyukjang and Bingajang was accepted as an “original text” or the “jeobon”. That is, most of the original in Hwangbyukjang and Bingajang used as a “published original text” of Chukswaejang and Daejeongjang was newly corrected based on Jaejojang.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.