@article{ART002149463},
author={Choi Jong Nam},
title={A Comparative Study for Classifications of the Collections in Chinese ＆ Tibetan Buddhist Sutra Lists and Shinpyeonjejonggyojangchongrok},
journal={Journal of Studies in Bibliography},
issn={1225-5246},
year={2016},
number={67},
pages={119-146},
doi={10.17258/jib.2016..67.119}
TY - JOUR
AU - Choi Jong Nam
TI - A Comparative Study for Classifications of the Collections in Chinese ＆ Tibetan Buddhist Sutra Lists and Shinpyeonjejonggyojangchongrok
JO - Journal of Studies in Bibliography
PY - 2016
VL - null
IS - 67
PB - Korean Society of Bibliography
SP - 119
EP - 146
SN - 1225-5246
AB - In this thesis, I compared and researched on classifications of the collections and the lists edited in China ＆ Tibet, and in Shinpyeonjejongyojangchongrok, which national teacher Daegak Uicheon collected and edited with annotations written in northen east asian countries, China, Korea, and Japan. Among the Buddhist stura lists edited in China, the Collections of Hwayen and Prajna were recorded in the first part of Lidaisanbaoji, Datangneidianlu, Kaiyuanshijiaolu, and Shinpyeonjejongyojangchongrok. And the Hwayen collection was recorded in the first part like Lidaisanbaoji, Datangneidianlu, and Shinpyeonjejongyojangchongrok, except for Chusanzanggjiji.
Therefore the reason why Hwayen collection was situated in the first part of Shinpyeonjejongyojangchongrok was because of Hwayen thought, the central thought of Mahayana thought, and influence by Lidaisanbaoji, Datangneidianlu, and a deep relationship that Uicheon had with Hwayen sect and Hwayen thought as a practitioner for 36 years.
From this, I could find out that the name of three sutras, which placed in the first part of each collection of Shinpyeonjejongyojangchongrok, and researches ＆ commentaries(章疏) lists, which situated in the latter part of the name of three sutras, were based on Datangneidianlu, Kaiyuanshijiaolu.
In the Buddhist sutra lists of Tibet, the Prajna collection was placed in the first part from the list of lDan kar ma edited in the sNga dar(前傳期). The Esoteric Buddhism collection of Peking print and the Precept collection of sDe dge print were recorded in the first part of the books among Koreana engraved in the Phyi dar(後傳期). The Hwayen collection was situated in the first part of Tibetan lists and Koreana.
The record of the Prajna collection in the list of lDan dkar ma situated in the first part was because of the of the Prajna and Madhyamaka though, which developed as the parts of practice and action with doctrine diversely in the sNga dar. And in the Phyi dar, the Esoteric collection and the Precept collection were placed in the first part of the Peking print and sDe dge print engraved in the processes of re-establishment of precept to rebuild Tibetan Buddhist Sangha Cluster disorganized by destruction of Buddhism and the movement of new Esoteric Buddhism to change the religious style accompanied with spell and Bon sect, the folksy religion.
Although the collections and Koreanas edited and engraved in China, Korea, and Tibet had different classification systems, the collections of Hwayen and Prajna, the central thoughts of Mahayana Buddhism, were typically recorded in the first part of those books in common.
KW - Shinpyeonjejongyojangchongrok;Chusanzanggjiji;Lidaisanbaoji;Datangneidianlu;Kaiyuanshijiaolu;the list of lDan kar ma
DO - 10.17258/jib.2016..67.119
ER -
Choi Jong Nam. (2016). A Comparative Study for Classifications of the Collections in Chinese ＆ Tibetan Buddhist Sutra Lists and Shinpyeonjejonggyojangchongrok. Journal of Studies in Bibliography, 67, 119-146.
Choi Jong Nam. 2016, "A Comparative Study for Classifications of the Collections in Chinese ＆ Tibetan Buddhist Sutra Lists and Shinpyeonjejonggyojangchongrok", Journal of Studies in Bibliography, no.67, pp.119-146. Available from: doi:10.17258/jib.2016..67.119
Choi Jong Nam "A Comparative Study for Classifications of the Collections in Chinese ＆ Tibetan Buddhist Sutra Lists and Shinpyeonjejonggyojangchongrok" Journal of Studies in Bibliography 67 pp.119-146 (2016) : 119.
Choi Jong Nam. A Comparative Study for Classifications of the Collections in Chinese ＆ Tibetan Buddhist Sutra Lists and Shinpyeonjejonggyojangchongrok. 2016; 67 : 119-146. Available from: doi:10.17258/jib.2016..67.119
Choi Jong Nam. "A Comparative Study for Classifications of the Collections in Chinese ＆ Tibetan Buddhist Sutra Lists and Shinpyeonjejonggyojangchongrok" Journal of Studies in Bibliography no.67(2016) : 119-146.doi: 10.17258/jib.2016..67.119
Choi Jong Nam. A Comparative Study for Classifications of the Collections in Chinese ＆ Tibetan Buddhist Sutra Lists and Shinpyeonjejonggyojangchongrok. Journal of Studies in Bibliography, 67, 119-146. doi: 10.17258/jib.2016..67.119
Choi Jong Nam. A Comparative Study for Classifications of the Collections in Chinese ＆ Tibetan Buddhist Sutra Lists and Shinpyeonjejonggyojangchongrok. Journal of Studies in Bibliography. 2016; 67 119-146. doi: 10.17258/jib.2016..67.119
Choi Jong Nam. A Comparative Study for Classifications of the Collections in Chinese ＆ Tibetan Buddhist Sutra Lists and Shinpyeonjejonggyojangchongrok. 2016; 67 : 119-146. Available from: doi:10.17258/jib.2016..67.119
Choi Jong Nam. "A Comparative Study for Classifications of the Collections in Chinese ＆ Tibetan Buddhist Sutra Lists and Shinpyeonjejonggyojangchongrok" Journal of Studies in Bibliography no.67(2016) : 119-146.doi: 10.17258/jib.2016..67.119
