KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART001037870},
author={Kim, Sin-young and Chang Soo Lee},
title={Analysis of Evaluation Indicators for the Development of Evaluation Models of Foreign Academic Journals},
journal={Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management},
issn={1013-0799},
year={2004},
volume={21},
number={2},
pages={45-68},
doi={10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.2.045}

TY - JOUR
AU - Kim, Sin-young
AU - Chang Soo Lee
TI - Analysis of Evaluation Indicators for the Development of Evaluation Models of Foreign Academic Journals
JO - Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management
PY - 2004
VL - 21
IS - 2
PB - 한국정보관리학회
SP - 45
EP - 68
SN - 1013-0799
AB - The purposes of this study are to compare and analyze the evaluation indicators for selection of journal suggested by scholars and organizations and to prepare theoretical background for the ideal model to meet opposing paradigms of collection management in academic libraries. A web survey method was employed to investigate applications of various selection criteria (27 for printed and 37 for electronic academic Journal) from the top 40 academic libraries in Korea. In addition, data were analysed statistically using factor analysis, t-test, Analysis of Variance(ANOVA), and Spearman's Rank Oder Correlation. The mean ranking for 9 evaluation indicators for printed were as follows: subscribing volumes per departments, degree of use, selection authority, electronic/print bundle, ISI impact factor, Internationality and reputation, costs for subscription, ILL & DDS, space considerations for printed materials. But, 11 evaluation indicators for electronic were as follows: costs for subscription, accessibility, electronic/print bundle, consortia, selection authority, access expandability, subscribing volumes per departments, scholarly features of the university, ISI impact factor, ILL & DDS, internationality and reputations.
KW - academic journal;electronic journal;evaluation indicator;selection criteria;university library
DO - 10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.2.045
ER -

Kim, Sin-young and Chang Soo Lee. (2004). Analysis of Evaluation Indicators for the Development of Evaluation Models of Foreign Academic Journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 21(2), 45-68.

Kim, Sin-young and Chang Soo Lee. 2004, "Analysis of Evaluation Indicators for the Development of Evaluation Models of Foreign Academic Journals", Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, vol.21, no.2 pp.45-68. Available from: doi:10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.2.045

Kim, Sin-young, Chang Soo Lee "Analysis of Evaluation Indicators for the Development of Evaluation Models of Foreign Academic Journals" Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management 21.2 pp.45-68 (2004) : 45.

Kim, Sin-young, Chang Soo Lee. Analysis of Evaluation Indicators for the Development of Evaluation Models of Foreign Academic Journals. 2004; 21(2), 45-68. Available from: doi:10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.2.045

Kim, Sin-young and Chang Soo Lee. "Analysis of Evaluation Indicators for the Development of Evaluation Models of Foreign Academic Journals" Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management 21, no.2 (2004) : 45-68.doi: 10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.2.045

Kim, Sin-young; Chang Soo Lee. Analysis of Evaluation Indicators for the Development of Evaluation Models of Foreign Academic Journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 21(2), 45-68. doi: 10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.2.045

Kim, Sin-young; Chang Soo Lee. Analysis of Evaluation Indicators for the Development of Evaluation Models of Foreign Academic Journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management. 2004; 21(2) 45-68. doi: 10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.2.045

Kim, Sin-young, Chang Soo Lee. Analysis of Evaluation Indicators for the Development of Evaluation Models of Foreign Academic Journals. 2004; 21(2), 45-68. Available from: doi:10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.2.045

Kim, Sin-young and Chang Soo Lee. "Analysis of Evaluation Indicators for the Development of Evaluation Models of Foreign Academic Journals" Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management 21, no.2 (2004) : 45-68.doi: 10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.2.045