The purpose of this study is to conduct risk-response analysis by region considering the spatio-temporal linkage structure of an emergency response system, to derive regions requiring intensive investment, and to analyze their characteristics. First, we looked at how urgent it is to build an emergency response system in our city or region. To this end, golden time standards were set for each response stage, and based on this, the golden time satisfaction rate for each response stage was analyzed for 229 cities(si), counties(gun), and districts(gu) across the country. On the other hand, even if the level of response is low, additional efforts may not be necessary in low-risk areas. Accordingly, in this study, 229 cities, counties, and districts were classified into four types by comparing risk levels and response levels, and areas requiring special measures (priority investment areas) were identified. Afterwards, the characteristics of the priority investment areas were also analyzed, and some useful policy implications were derived. However, it is difficult to obtain data on the current status of violent crimes by region, so there is a limit to analyzing only 77 cities. Additional analysis is required in the future to derive more meaningful results.