@article{ART001377979},
author={In-Shik Bong},
title={The Disadvantage of Simple Additive Weighting for Decision Making of Urban Planning: Comparative Evaluation of SAW and PROMETHEE Focused on Weight Stability},
journal={The Korea Spatial Planning Review},
issn={1229-8638},
year={2009},
volume={62},
pages={169-179},
doi={10.15793/kspr.2009.62..009}
TY - JOUR
AU - In-Shik Bong
TI - The Disadvantage of Simple Additive Weighting for Decision Making of Urban Planning: Comparative Evaluation of SAW and PROMETHEE Focused on Weight Stability
JO - The Korea Spatial Planning Review
PY - 2009
VL - 62
IS - null
PB - 국토연구원
SP - 169
EP - 179
SN - 1229-8638
AB - This study aims to reveal the disadvantage of SAW(simple additive weighting) comparing to PROMETHEE method, which is used frequently for decision making of urban planning, focused on weight stability. For this purpose, two indicators(ratio of ranking variation, weight stability interval), with which the robustness for weight can be measured, are used. The ratio of ranking variation of the SAW is higher than the PROMETHEE for all criteria. In the case of weight stability interval, the PROMETHEE is lager than the SAW. The SAW is more sensitive and vulnerable to the weighting variation that the PROMETHEE. Although the weight cannot be given without the subjective judgement, the principal result clear that the SAW is not advises for significant decision making and that the PROMETHEE should be an alternative method.
KW - Urban Planning;MCDM;SAW;PROMETHEE
DO - 10.15793/kspr.2009.62..009
ER -
In-Shik Bong. (2009). The Disadvantage of Simple Additive Weighting for Decision Making of Urban Planning: Comparative Evaluation of SAW and PROMETHEE Focused on Weight Stability. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 62, 169-179.
In-Shik Bong. 2009, "The Disadvantage of Simple Additive Weighting for Decision Making of Urban Planning: Comparative Evaluation of SAW and PROMETHEE Focused on Weight Stability", The Korea Spatial Planning Review, vol.62, pp.169-179. Available from: doi:10.15793/kspr.2009.62..009
In-Shik Bong "The Disadvantage of Simple Additive Weighting for Decision Making of Urban Planning: Comparative Evaluation of SAW and PROMETHEE Focused on Weight Stability" The Korea Spatial Planning Review 62 pp.169-179 (2009) : 169.
In-Shik Bong. The Disadvantage of Simple Additive Weighting for Decision Making of Urban Planning: Comparative Evaluation of SAW and PROMETHEE Focused on Weight Stability. 2009; 62 169-179. Available from: doi:10.15793/kspr.2009.62..009
In-Shik Bong. "The Disadvantage of Simple Additive Weighting for Decision Making of Urban Planning: Comparative Evaluation of SAW and PROMETHEE Focused on Weight Stability" The Korea Spatial Planning Review 62(2009) : 169-179.doi: 10.15793/kspr.2009.62..009
In-Shik Bong. The Disadvantage of Simple Additive Weighting for Decision Making of Urban Planning: Comparative Evaluation of SAW and PROMETHEE Focused on Weight Stability. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 62, 169-179. doi: 10.15793/kspr.2009.62..009
In-Shik Bong. The Disadvantage of Simple Additive Weighting for Decision Making of Urban Planning: Comparative Evaluation of SAW and PROMETHEE Focused on Weight Stability. The Korea Spatial Planning Review. 2009; 62 169-179. doi: 10.15793/kspr.2009.62..009
In-Shik Bong. The Disadvantage of Simple Additive Weighting for Decision Making of Urban Planning: Comparative Evaluation of SAW and PROMETHEE Focused on Weight Stability. 2009; 62 169-179. Available from: doi:10.15793/kspr.2009.62..009
In-Shik Bong. "The Disadvantage of Simple Additive Weighting for Decision Making of Urban Planning: Comparative Evaluation of SAW and PROMETHEE Focused on Weight Stability" The Korea Spatial Planning Review 62(2009) : 169-179.doi: 10.15793/kspr.2009.62..009
