[journal]
김남진
/ 1986
/ 사인을 위한 공용수용
/ 법학논집
24
: 1~23
[book]
류해웅
/ 2000
/ 토지에 대한 공익과 사익의 조정에 관한 연구
/ 국토연구원
[confproc]
서울대학교 법학연구소
/ 2006
/ 법에 있어서의 공익
/ 청담 최송화 교수 정년 기념 학술회의 자료집
[thesis]
장민선
/ 2009
/ 미국 헌법상 재산권 수용에 관한 연구
/ 박사
/ 이화여자대학교 대학원
[journal]
Blais, L. E.
/ 2010
/ The Problem with Pretext
/ Fordham Urban Law Journal
38(4)
: 963~985
[journal]
Columbia Law Review
/ 1946
/ Note: The Constitutionality of Excess Condemnation
/ Columbia Law Review
46(1)
: 108~117
[journal]
Coughlin, M. J.
/ 2005
/ Absolute Deference Leads to Unconstitutional Governance: The Need for a New Public Use Rule
/ Catholic University Law Review
54(3)
: 1001~1038
[journal]
Cramer, B. D.
/ 2004
/ Eminent Domain for Private Development: An Irrational Basis for the Erosion of Property Rights
/ Case Western Reserve Law Review
55(2)
: 409~441
[journal]
Durham, J. G.
/ 1985
/ Efficient Just Compensation as a Limit on Eminent Domain
/ Minnesota Law Review
69(6)
: 1277~1314
[book]
Epstein, R. A.
/ 1985
/ Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain
/ Harvard University Press
[journal]
Farjad, N.
/ 2007
/ Condemnation Friendly or Land Use Wise? A Broad Interpretation of the Public Use Requirement Works Well for New York City
/ Fordham Law Review
76(2)
: 1121~1175
[journal]
Fischel, W. A.
/ 2004
/ The Political Economy of Public Use in Poletown: How Federal Grants Encourage Excessive Use of Eminent Domain
/ Michigan State Law Review
2004(4)
: 929~955
[book]
GAO
/ 2006
/ Eminent Domain: Information About it Uses Effect on Property Owners Communities is Limited
/ U.S. Government Accountability Office
[journal]
Goodin, A. W.
/ 2007
/ Rejecting The Return to Blight In Post-Kelo State Legislation
/ New York University Law Review
82(1)
: 177~208
[journal]
Jones, S. J.
/ 2000
/ Trumping Eminent Domain Law: An Argument for Strict Scrutiny Analysis Under the Public Use Requirement of the Fifth Amendment
/ Syracuse Law Review
50(1)
: 285~314
[journal]
Kanner, G.
/ 2006
/ The Public Use Clause: Constitutional Mandate or ‘Hortatory Fluff’?
/ Pepperdine Law Review
33(2)
: 335~384
[journal]
Kelly, D. B.
/ 2006
/ The ‘Public Use’ Requirement in Eminent Domain Law: a Rational Based on Secret Purchase and Private Influence
/ Cornell Law Review
92(1)
: 1~65
[journal]
Kotlyarevskaya, O. V.
/ 2006
/ Public Use Requirement in Eminent Domain Cases Based on Slum Clearance, Elimination of Urban Blight, and Economic Development
/ Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal
5(2)
: 197~231
[journal]
Lazzarotti, J. L.
/ 1999
/ Public Use or Public Abuse
/ UMKC(University of Missouri-Kansas City) Law Review
68(1)
: 49~76
[journal]
Meidinger, E. E.
/ 1980
/ The ‘Public Uses’ of Eminent Domain: History and Policy
/ Environmental Law
11(1)
: 1~66
[journal]
Merrill, T. W.
/ 1986
/ The Economics of Public Use
/ Cornell Law Review
72
: 61~116
[journal]
Merrill, T. W.
/ 2005
/ Poletown Overruled: Recent Michigan Case Tightens the Reins On the Public Use Requirement-The Misplaced Flight to Substance
/ Probate & Property
19(2)
: 16~17
[journal]
Miceli, T. J.
/ 2007
/ The Economics of Eminent Domain: Private Property, Public Use, and Just Compensation
/ Foundations and Trends® in Microeconomics
3(4)
: 275~329
[journal]
Mihaly, M.
/ 2011
/ Kelo’s Trail: A Survey of State and Federal Legislative and Judicial Activity Five Years Later
/ Ecology Law Quarterly
38(3)
: 703~729
[other]
O’connor, S. D.
/ 2005
/ O.CONNOR, J., dissenting
/ Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469
[journal]
Ostrowski, C. R.
/ 2009
/ A ‘Blighted Area’ of the Law: Why Eminent Domain Legislation Is Still Necessary in New Jersey After Gallenthin
/ Seton Hall Law Review
39(1)
: 225~264
[journal]
Oswald, L. J.
/ 2008
/ Public Uses and Non-Uses: Sinister Schemes, Improper Motives, and Bad Faith in Eminent Domain Law
/ Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review
35(1)
: 45~76
[book]
Porter, D. R.
/ 2007
/ A ULI Current Issues Report: Eminent Domain: An Important Tool for Community Revitalization
/ Urban Land Institute
[journal]
Saginor, J.
/ 2009
/ Eminent Domain: A Review of the Issues
/ Journal of Real Estate Literature
17(1)
: 3~43
[other]
Salzman, L.
/ 2005
/ The Tyranny of Eminent Domain
/ Washington Times
[book]
Schultz, D. A.
/ 1992
/ Property, Power, and American Democracy
/ Transaction Publishers
[journal]
Scott, J. W.
/ 2003
/ Public Use and Private Profit: When Should Heightened Scrutiny Be Applied to ‘Public-Private’ Takings?
/ Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law
12(4)
: 466~490
[journal]
Somin, I.
/ 2009
/ The Limits of Backlash: Assessing the Political Response to Kelo
/ Minnesota Law Review
93(6)
: 2100~2178
[journal]
Somin, I.
/ 2011
/ Let There Be Blight: Blight Condemnations in New York After Goldstein and Kaur
/ Fordham Urban Law Journal
38(4)
: 1193~1219
[book]
Staley, S.
/ 2005
/ Eminent Domain, Private Property, and Redevelopment: An Economic Analysis
/ Reason Foundation
[journal]
Summers, G. E.
/ 1993
/ Private Property Without Lochner: Toward a Takings Jurisprudence Uncorrupted by Substantive Due Process
/ University of Pennsylvania Law Review
142(2)
: 837~885
[journal]
Treanor, W. M.
/ 1995
/ The Original Understanding of the Takings Clause and the Political Process
/ Columbia Law Review
95(4)
: 782~887
[journal]
Wiggins, L. A.
/ 2006
/ A Bibliography of Sources on Public Use in Eminent Domain
/ Chapman Law Review
10(1)
: 235~255