@article{ART002181131},
author={최수진},
title={The Impact of City-County Consolidation on Rural Development : Focusing on the Change of City-County Consolidation and Residence Tax},
journal={The Korea Spatial Planning Review},
issn={1229-8638},
year={2016},
volume={91},
pages={41-54},
doi={10.15793/kspr.2016.91..003}
TY - JOUR
AU - 최수진
TI - The Impact of City-County Consolidation on Rural Development : Focusing on the Change of City-County Consolidation and Residence Tax
JO - The Korea Spatial Planning Review
PY - 2016
VL - 91
IS - null
PB - 국토연구원
SP - 41
EP - 54
SN - 1229-8638
AB - This study estimates growth effect of city-county consolidation employing three econometric models which are based on different assumptions. In the model based on Granger causality, economic growth effect is significantly derived from seven years after the city-county consolidation. In the difference-in-difference model, which controls time-invariant regional specific effect including initial condition, the growth effect is insignificant. However, in the Panel Random Effect model, which assumes that regional specific effect is random because it has been influenced from city-county consolidation and other events, the growth effect is highly significant. The time span of the research includes the 1997 financial crisis and a necessity arises to control its different influence on each region. Accordingly, the result of Panel Random Effect Model is more convincing and I conclude that city-county consolidation significantly encourages rural development. The analysis also illustrates that the growth is led by physical capital and human capital is insignificant in rural development and it implies that the government should support labor productivity and education in backward region.
KW - City-County Consolidation;Rural Development;Difference in Difference;Random Effect
DO - 10.15793/kspr.2016.91..003
ER -
최수진. (2016). The Impact of City-County Consolidation on Rural Development : Focusing on the Change of City-County Consolidation and Residence Tax. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 91, 41-54.
최수진. 2016, "The Impact of City-County Consolidation on Rural Development : Focusing on the Change of City-County Consolidation and Residence Tax", The Korea Spatial Planning Review, vol.91, pp.41-54. Available from: doi:10.15793/kspr.2016.91..003
최수진 "The Impact of City-County Consolidation on Rural Development : Focusing on the Change of City-County Consolidation and Residence Tax" The Korea Spatial Planning Review 91 pp.41-54 (2016) : 41.
최수진. The Impact of City-County Consolidation on Rural Development : Focusing on the Change of City-County Consolidation and Residence Tax. 2016; 91 41-54. Available from: doi:10.15793/kspr.2016.91..003
최수진. "The Impact of City-County Consolidation on Rural Development : Focusing on the Change of City-County Consolidation and Residence Tax" The Korea Spatial Planning Review 91(2016) : 41-54.doi: 10.15793/kspr.2016.91..003
최수진. The Impact of City-County Consolidation on Rural Development : Focusing on the Change of City-County Consolidation and Residence Tax. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 91, 41-54. doi: 10.15793/kspr.2016.91..003
최수진. The Impact of City-County Consolidation on Rural Development : Focusing on the Change of City-County Consolidation and Residence Tax. The Korea Spatial Planning Review. 2016; 91 41-54. doi: 10.15793/kspr.2016.91..003
최수진. The Impact of City-County Consolidation on Rural Development : Focusing on the Change of City-County Consolidation and Residence Tax. 2016; 91 41-54. Available from: doi:10.15793/kspr.2016.91..003
최수진. "The Impact of City-County Consolidation on Rural Development : Focusing on the Change of City-County Consolidation and Residence Tax" The Korea Spatial Planning Review 91(2016) : 41-54.doi: 10.15793/kspr.2016.91..003
