Posterior Fusion for Thoracolumbar Fractures with a Neurologic Deficit: A Comparison of Fusion and Additional Decompression (신경학적 증상을 동반한 흉요추 골절에서 후방 유합술: 유합술과 감압술 추가한 군과의 비교)

Sohn Hong Moon (손홍문); 유재원; 박상수; Bosun Kim (김보선); 정성

Posterior Fusion for Thoracolumbar Fractures with a Neurologic Deficit: A Comparison of Fusion and Additional Decompression

Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
Abbr : J Kor Spine Sur
2016, 23(1), pp.7-14
Publisher : Korean Society Of Spine Surgery
Research Area : Medicine and Pharmacy > Orthopedic Surgery

Sohn Hong Moon ¹, 유재원 ¹, 박상수 ², Bosun Kim ², 정성 ²

¹조선대학교
²조선대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실, 척추센터

Accredited

ABSTRACT

Study Design: A retrospective study. Objectives: To understand the necessity of additional posterior decompression when treating a patient with posterior fusion for thoracolumbar fractures with a neurologic deficit. Summary of Literature Review: Additional posterior decompression is still controversial when treating a patient with posterior fusion for thoracolumbar fractures with neurologic a deficit. Materials and Methods: 40 patients who underwent posterior fusion surgery for thoracolumbar fractures with a neurologic deficit were evaluated. The posterior fusion group (Group 1) included 23 patients (M:F=14:9), and the posterior decompression with laminectomy and posterolateral fusion group (Group 2) included 17 patients (M:F=9:8). According to the Frankel grade, the most common neurologic deficit was grade D in both groups. Unstable burst fractures were the most commonly observed fractures in both groups according to the McAfee classification. A radiographic evaluation was carried out along with a comparison of the spinal canal encroachment and the kyphotic angle. We evaluated neurologic improvement as the clinical criterion. Results: The l-kyphotic angle at last follow-up was smaller than the preoperative kyphotic angle in both groups. The preoperative canal encroachment was 53.4% (Group 1) and 59.8% (Group 2). Further, neurologic improvement was observed in 19 cases (Group 1) and 14 cases (Group 2). There was no significant difference in the proportion of cases with neurologic improvement between the two groups (improvement in 19 cases in Group 1 and in 14 cases in Group 2) (p<0.05). Further, the preoperative canal encroachment, kyphotic angle, and final neurologic improvement showed no significant correlations between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: We concluded that additional posterior decompression in the case of thoracolumbar fractures with neurologic deficit is not required for neurologic improvement.

KEYWORDS

Thoracolumbar fracture, Neurologic deficit, Posterior fusion, Posterior decompression

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

[journal] Zdeblick TA / 2009 / Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures / Instr Course Lect 58 : 639~644

[journal] Mohanty SP / 2002 / Does neurological recovery in thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures depend on the extent of canal compromise? / Spinal Cord 40 : 295~299

[journal] Frankel HL / 1969 / The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. I / Paraplegia 7 : 179~192

[journal] Rath SA / 2005 / Neurological recovery and its influencing factors in thoracic and lumbar spine fractures after surgical decompression and stabilization / Neurosurg Rev 28 : 44~52

[journal] Magerl F / 1994 / A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries / Eur Spine J 3 : 184~201

[journal] Harrington RM / 1993 / Biomechanics of indirect reduction of bone retropulsed into the spinal canal in vertebral fracture / Spine 18 : 692~699

[journal] Bradford DS / 1987 / Surgical management of thoracolumbar spine fractures with incomplete neurologic deficits / Clin Orthop Relat Res : 201~216

[journal] Hu SS / 1993 / The effect of surgical decompression on neurologic outcome after lumbar fractures / Clin Orthop Relat Res : 166~173

[journal] Bohlman HH / 1981 / Surgical techniques of anterior decompression and fusion for spinal cord injuries / Clin Orthop Relat Res : 57~67

[journal] McAfee PC / 1985 / Anterior decompression of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures with incomplete neurological deficit using a retroperitoneal approach / J Bone Joint Surg Am 67 : 89~104

[journal] Handel SF / 1979 / Posterior lumbar apophyseal fractures / Radiology 130 : 629~633

[journal] Lindahl S / 1983 / Computed tomography of bone fragments in the spinal canal. An experimental study / Spine 8 : 181~186

[journal] Benson DR / 1988 / Unstable thoracolumbar fractures, with emphasis on the burst fracture / Clin Orthop Relat Res : 14~29

[journal] Mimatsu K / 1993 / New vertebral body impactors for posterolateral decompression of burst fracture / Spine 18 : 1366~1368

[journal] McAfee PC / 1982 / The unstable burst fracture / Spine 7 : 365~373

[journal] Muralidhar BM / 2014 / Management of unstable thoracolumbar spinal fractures by pedicle screws and rods fixation / J Clin Diagn Res 8 : 121~123

[book] Huler RJ / 1997 / The adult spine-principles and practice / Lippincott-Raven

[journal] Lee CS / 2001 / Survival analysis of posterior short fusion in thoracolumbar fracture; Significance of load sharing score and bone mineral density / J Kor Spine Surg 8 : 113~119

[journal] Starr JK / 1992 / Junctional burst fractures / Spine 17 : 551~557

[journal] Benson DR / 1992 / Unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures treated with the AO fixateur interne / J Spinal Disord 5 : 335~343

[journal] Gertzbein SD / 1988 / The neurological outcome following surgery for spinal fractures / Spine 13 : 641~644

[journal] Oner FC / 2010 / Therapeutic decision making in thoracolumbar spine trauma / Spine 35 : S235~S244

[journal] Reinhold M / 2009 / Operative treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spinal column / Unfallchirurg 112 : 294~316

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 0.03