@article{ART002672591},
author={AhRang Cho and KyengUk Yeo and MiSook Jung and JaeHee Lee and YANG SU JEONG and Ravi Gautam and GiYong Lee and JiHun Jo and Manju Acharya and Anju Maharjan and Kim Chang Yul and Yong Heo},
title={Skin Sensitizing Predictability on Chemical Substances with False Positivity or Negativity Following the Transfer of Human Cell Line Activation Test},
journal={Journal of Alternatives to Animal Experiments},
issn={1975-9657},
year={2020},
volume={14},
number={1},
pages={15-21},
doi={10.23032/jaae.2020.14.1.002}
TY - JOUR
AU - AhRang Cho
AU - KyengUk Yeo
AU - MiSook Jung
AU - JaeHee Lee
AU - YANG SU JEONG
AU - Ravi Gautam
AU - GiYong Lee
AU - JiHun Jo
AU - Manju Acharya
AU - Anju Maharjan
AU - Kim Chang Yul
AU - Yong Heo
TI - Skin Sensitizing Predictability on Chemical Substances with False Positivity or Negativity Following the Transfer of Human Cell Line Activation Test
JO - Journal of Alternatives to Animal Experiments
PY - 2020
VL - 14
IS - 1
PB - Korean Society for Alternatives to Animal Experiments
SP - 15
EP - 21
SN - 1975-9657
AB - The in vitro alternative assay for evaluating skin sensitizing potentials (SSP) called human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) has been recently adopted as an international test guideline. The present study was proceeded to pursue the domestic establishment and expansion of h-CLAT. The standard operational procedure was prepared in detail by the lead laboratory (LL) and transferred to one participating laboratory (PL). The LL demonstrated technical proficiency for the 10 substances listed in OECD TG 442E. The PL also demonstrated a certain level of proficiency, in that 4-phenylenediamine and 4-aminobenzoic acid distributed with coded names were correctly classified as positive and negative on SSP, respectively, and other indices including 75% cell viability (CV75) and relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) % for CD54 and CD86 were fell within the reference range. Methyl methacrylate, nickel chloride, and resorcinol, which are inconsistent in predicting SSP through various alternative test methods, were unanimously predicted as negative, positive, and positive on SSP by the two laboratories for the first time through h-CLAT. Both chlorobenzene and sodium lauryl sulfate with the existing h-CLAT report as positive and negative, respectively, were predicted as negative by the PL, which could contribute toward overall categorization into non-skin sensitizer.
KW - human-Cell Line Activation Test;Predictability;Transferability;false positive or negative chemicals;skin sensitization
DO - 10.23032/jaae.2020.14.1.002
ER -
AhRang Cho, KyengUk Yeo, MiSook Jung, JaeHee Lee, YANG SU JEONG, Ravi Gautam, GiYong Lee, JiHun Jo, Manju Acharya, Anju Maharjan, Kim Chang Yul and Yong Heo. (2020). Skin Sensitizing Predictability on Chemical Substances with False Positivity or Negativity Following the Transfer of Human Cell Line Activation Test. Journal of Alternatives to Animal Experiments, 14(1), 15-21.
AhRang Cho, KyengUk Yeo, MiSook Jung, JaeHee Lee, YANG SU JEONG, Ravi Gautam, GiYong Lee, JiHun Jo, Manju Acharya, Anju Maharjan, Kim Chang Yul and Yong Heo. 2020, "Skin Sensitizing Predictability on Chemical Substances with False Positivity or Negativity Following the Transfer of Human Cell Line Activation Test", Journal of Alternatives to Animal Experiments, vol.14, no.1 pp.15-21. Available from: doi:10.23032/jaae.2020.14.1.002
AhRang Cho, KyengUk Yeo, MiSook Jung, JaeHee Lee, YANG SU JEONG, Ravi Gautam, GiYong Lee, JiHun Jo, Manju Acharya, Anju Maharjan, Kim Chang Yul, Yong Heo "Skin Sensitizing Predictability on Chemical Substances with False Positivity or Negativity Following the Transfer of Human Cell Line Activation Test" Journal of Alternatives to Animal Experiments 14.1 pp.15-21 (2020) : 15.
AhRang Cho, KyengUk Yeo, MiSook Jung, JaeHee Lee, YANG SU JEONG, Ravi Gautam, GiYong Lee, JiHun Jo, Manju Acharya, Anju Maharjan, Kim Chang Yul, Yong Heo. Skin Sensitizing Predictability on Chemical Substances with False Positivity or Negativity Following the Transfer of Human Cell Line Activation Test. 2020; 14(1), 15-21. Available from: doi:10.23032/jaae.2020.14.1.002
AhRang Cho, KyengUk Yeo, MiSook Jung, JaeHee Lee, YANG SU JEONG, Ravi Gautam, GiYong Lee, JiHun Jo, Manju Acharya, Anju Maharjan, Kim Chang Yul and Yong Heo. "Skin Sensitizing Predictability on Chemical Substances with False Positivity or Negativity Following the Transfer of Human Cell Line Activation Test" Journal of Alternatives to Animal Experiments 14, no.1 (2020) : 15-21.doi: 10.23032/jaae.2020.14.1.002
AhRang Cho; KyengUk Yeo; MiSook Jung; JaeHee Lee; YANG SU JEONG; Ravi Gautam; GiYong Lee; JiHun Jo; Manju Acharya; Anju Maharjan; Kim Chang Yul; Yong Heo. Skin Sensitizing Predictability on Chemical Substances with False Positivity or Negativity Following the Transfer of Human Cell Line Activation Test. Journal of Alternatives to Animal Experiments, 14(1), 15-21. doi: 10.23032/jaae.2020.14.1.002
AhRang Cho; KyengUk Yeo; MiSook Jung; JaeHee Lee; YANG SU JEONG; Ravi Gautam; GiYong Lee; JiHun Jo; Manju Acharya; Anju Maharjan; Kim Chang Yul; Yong Heo. Skin Sensitizing Predictability on Chemical Substances with False Positivity or Negativity Following the Transfer of Human Cell Line Activation Test. Journal of Alternatives to Animal Experiments. 2020; 14(1) 15-21. doi: 10.23032/jaae.2020.14.1.002
AhRang Cho, KyengUk Yeo, MiSook Jung, JaeHee Lee, YANG SU JEONG, Ravi Gautam, GiYong Lee, JiHun Jo, Manju Acharya, Anju Maharjan, Kim Chang Yul, Yong Heo. Skin Sensitizing Predictability on Chemical Substances with False Positivity or Negativity Following the Transfer of Human Cell Line Activation Test. 2020; 14(1), 15-21. Available from: doi:10.23032/jaae.2020.14.1.002
AhRang Cho, KyengUk Yeo, MiSook Jung, JaeHee Lee, YANG SU JEONG, Ravi Gautam, GiYong Lee, JiHun Jo, Manju Acharya, Anju Maharjan, Kim Chang Yul and Yong Heo. "Skin Sensitizing Predictability on Chemical Substances with False Positivity or Negativity Following the Transfer of Human Cell Line Activation Test" Journal of Alternatives to Animal Experiments 14, no.1 (2020) : 15-21.doi: 10.23032/jaae.2020.14.1.002