@article{ART001474863},
author={신소은 and Yong Pyo Kim and Chang Hee Kang},
title={Comparison of the PM10 Concentration in Different Measurement Methods at Gosan Site in Jeju Island},
journal={Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment},
issn={1225-7184},
year={2010},
volume={19},
number={4},
pages={421-429}
TY - JOUR
AU - 신소은
AU - Yong Pyo Kim
AU - Chang Hee Kang
TI - Comparison of the PM10 Concentration in Different Measurement Methods at Gosan Site in Jeju Island
JO - Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
PY - 2010
VL - 19
IS - 4
PB - Korean Society Of Environmental Impact Assessment
SP - 421
EP - 429
SN - 1225-7184
AB - The reliability of the measurement of ambient trace species is an important issue, especially,in background area such as Gosan in Jeju Island. In a previous episodic study, it was suggested that the PM10 measurement result by the gravimetric method(GMM) was not in agreement with the result by the b-ray absorption method(BAM). In this study, a systematic comparison was carried out for the data between 2001 and 2008 at Gosan(GMM and BAM) and Jeju city (BAM) which is near to Gosan. It was found that at Gosan the PM10 concentration by BAM was higher than GMM and the correlation between them was low. The BAM results at Gosan and Jeju city showed similar trend implying the discrepancy at Gosan was not caused by instrumental problem of the BAM at Gosan. Based on the previous studies two probable reasons for the discrepancy are identified; (1) negative measurement error by the evaporation of volatile ambient species at the filter in GMM such as nitrate and ammonium and (2) positive error by the absorption of water vapor during measurement in BAM. There was no heater at the inlet of BAM at Gosan during the sampling period. Based on the size-segregated measurement data, it was identified that the evaporation error was minor, if any. The relationship between the two methods did not vary with the ambient relative humidity. Thus,at present, it is not clear why the discrepancy had been occurring and when using the PM10data at Gosan, one should be aware the possible errors.
KW - PM10;b-ray absorption method;gravimetric method;relative humidity;evaporation error
DO -
UR -
ER -
신소은, Yong Pyo Kim and Chang Hee Kang. (2010). Comparison of the PM10 Concentration in Different Measurement Methods at Gosan Site in Jeju Island. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 19(4), 421-429.
신소은, Yong Pyo Kim and Chang Hee Kang. 2010, "Comparison of the PM10 Concentration in Different Measurement Methods at Gosan Site in Jeju Island", Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, vol.19, no.4 pp.421-429.
신소은, Yong Pyo Kim, Chang Hee Kang "Comparison of the PM10 Concentration in Different Measurement Methods at Gosan Site in Jeju Island" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 19.4 pp.421-429 (2010) : 421.
신소은, Yong Pyo Kim, Chang Hee Kang. Comparison of the PM10 Concentration in Different Measurement Methods at Gosan Site in Jeju Island. 2010; 19(4), 421-429.
신소은, Yong Pyo Kim and Chang Hee Kang. "Comparison of the PM10 Concentration in Different Measurement Methods at Gosan Site in Jeju Island" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 19, no.4 (2010) : 421-429.
신소은; Yong Pyo Kim; Chang Hee Kang. Comparison of the PM10 Concentration in Different Measurement Methods at Gosan Site in Jeju Island. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 19(4), 421-429.
신소은; Yong Pyo Kim; Chang Hee Kang. Comparison of the PM10 Concentration in Different Measurement Methods at Gosan Site in Jeju Island. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment. 2010; 19(4) 421-429.
신소은, Yong Pyo Kim, Chang Hee Kang. Comparison of the PM10 Concentration in Different Measurement Methods at Gosan Site in Jeju Island. 2010; 19(4), 421-429.
신소은, Yong Pyo Kim and Chang Hee Kang. "Comparison of the PM10 Concentration in Different Measurement Methods at Gosan Site in Jeju Island" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 19, no.4 (2010) : 421-429.
