@article{ART002159722},
author={CHO JAE HEON},
title={Comparative analysis of auto - calibration methods using QUAL2Kw and assessment on the water quality management alternatives for Sum River},
journal={Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment},
issn={1225-7184},
year={2016},
volume={25},
number={5},
pages={345-356},
doi={10.14249/eia.2016.25.5.346}
TY - JOUR
AU - CHO JAE HEON
TI - Comparative analysis of auto - calibration methods using QUAL2Kw and assessment on the water quality management alternatives for Sum River
JO - Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
PY - 2016
VL - 25
IS - 5
PB - Korean Society Of Environmental Impact Assessment
SP - 345
EP - 356
SN - 1225-7184
AB - In this study, auto-calibration method for water quality model was compared and analyzed using QUAL2Kw, which can estimate the optimum parameters through the integration of genetic algorithm and QUAL2K. The QUAL2Kw was applied to the Sum River which is greatly affected by the pollution loads of Wonju city. Two auto-calibration methods were examined: single parameter application for the whole river reach and separate parameter application for each reach of multiple reaches. The analysis about CV(RMSE) and fitness of the GA show that the separate parameter auto-calibration method is better than the single parameter method in the degree of precision. Thus the separate parameter auto-calibration method is applied to the water quality modelling of this study. The calibrated QUAL2Kw was used for the three scenarios for the water quality management of the Sum River, and the water quality impact on the river was analyzed. In scenario 1, which improve the effluent water quality of Wonju WWTP, BOD and TP concentrations of the Sum River 4-1 station which is representative one of Mid-Watershed, are decreased 17.7% and 29.1%, respectively. And immediately after joining the Wonjucheon, BOD and TP concentrations are decreased 50.4% and 40.5%, respectively. In scenario 2, Wonju water supply intake is closed and multi-regional water supply, which come from other watershed except the Sum River, is provided.
The Sum River water quality in scenario 2 is slightly improved as the flow of the river is increased.
Immediately after joining the Wonjucheon, BOD and TP concentrations are decreased 0.18mg/L and 0.0063mg/L, respectively. In scenario 3, the water quality management alternatives of scenario 1 and 2 are planned simultaneously, the Sum River water quality is slightly more improved than scenario 1. Water quality prediction of the three scenarios indicates that effluent water quality improvement of Wonju WWTP is the most efficient alternative in water quality management of the Sum River. Particularly the Sum River water quality immediately after joining the Wonjucheon is greatly improved. When Wonju water supply intake is closed and multi-regional water supply is provided, the Sum River water quality is slightly improved.
KW - QUAL2Kw;auto-calibration method;Sum River;Wonju WWTP;multi-regional water supply
DO - 10.14249/eia.2016.25.5.346
ER -
CHO JAE HEON. (2016). Comparative analysis of auto - calibration methods using QUAL2Kw and assessment on the water quality management alternatives for Sum River. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 25(5), 345-356.
CHO JAE HEON. 2016, "Comparative analysis of auto - calibration methods using QUAL2Kw and assessment on the water quality management alternatives for Sum River", Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, vol.25, no.5 pp.345-356. Available from: doi:10.14249/eia.2016.25.5.346
CHO JAE HEON "Comparative analysis of auto - calibration methods using QUAL2Kw and assessment on the water quality management alternatives for Sum River" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 25.5 pp.345-356 (2016) : 345.
CHO JAE HEON. Comparative analysis of auto - calibration methods using QUAL2Kw and assessment on the water quality management alternatives for Sum River. 2016; 25(5), 345-356. Available from: doi:10.14249/eia.2016.25.5.346
CHO JAE HEON. "Comparative analysis of auto - calibration methods using QUAL2Kw and assessment on the water quality management alternatives for Sum River" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 25, no.5 (2016) : 345-356.doi: 10.14249/eia.2016.25.5.346
CHO JAE HEON. Comparative analysis of auto - calibration methods using QUAL2Kw and assessment on the water quality management alternatives for Sum River. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 25(5), 345-356. doi: 10.14249/eia.2016.25.5.346
CHO JAE HEON. Comparative analysis of auto - calibration methods using QUAL2Kw and assessment on the water quality management alternatives for Sum River. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment. 2016; 25(5) 345-356. doi: 10.14249/eia.2016.25.5.346
CHO JAE HEON. Comparative analysis of auto - calibration methods using QUAL2Kw and assessment on the water quality management alternatives for Sum River. 2016; 25(5), 345-356. Available from: doi:10.14249/eia.2016.25.5.346
CHO JAE HEON. "Comparative analysis of auto - calibration methods using QUAL2Kw and assessment on the water quality management alternatives for Sum River" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 25, no.5 (2016) : 345-356.doi: 10.14249/eia.2016.25.5.346