The Empirical Study on collaborative governance building during city-county consolidation: comparative analysis on consolidation process in United Yeosu and Jeon Ju-WanJu (행정구역 통합과정에서 협력적 거버넌스 구축에 관한 실증적 연구: 여수시와 전주권(전주·완주)의 통합과정 비교분석 )

kim lee soo (김이수)

The Empirical Study on collaborative governance building during city-county consolidation: comparative analysis on consolidation process in United Yeosu and Jeon Ju-WanJu

Korean Society and Public Administration
Abbr : KSPA
2011, 22(3), pp.69-94
Publisher : Seoul Association For Public Administration
Research Area : Social Science > Public Administration

kim lee soo ¹

¹전북발전연구원

Accredited

ABSTRACT

City-county consolidation is currently a hot issue in Korea. This article aims to empirically analyze processes of city-county consolidation using a collaborative governance approach. Collaborative governance processes and the city-county consolidation debate are briefly explained. The analytical framework partly refines Ansell & Gash's model, while YeoSu (United) City and Jeonju-Wanju are analyzed as cases.Collaborative governance processes are categorized into three parts. First, initial conditions, including the prior history of conflict or cooperation, and power and resource imbalances. Second, collaborative processes, including face-to-face dialogue, trust building, shared understanding, and intermediate outcomes, and third, facilitative leadership, which influences the whole collaborative process. The YeoSu (United) City and Jeonju-Wanju consolidation processes are compared through collaborative governance frameworks. The analysis finds that the Jeonju-Wanju consolidation process lacked collaborative governance processes such as face-to-face dialogue, trust building, shared understanding, intermediate outcomes, and facilitative leadership.Consequently, policy implications are deduced. First, while collaborative governance was effective in explaining consolidation among local governments, there are differences in collaborative governance factors during consolidation. Second, among political actors, facilitative leadership played an important role in consolidation.

KEYWORDS

city-county consolidation, collaborative governance, facilitative leadership, face-to-face dialogue, trust building, shared understanding

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

[journal] 김동훈 / 1996 / 도농통합형 행정구역개편의 효과분석 및 발전방향에 관한 연구 / 충남대학 교 사회과학연구소 논문집 7 : 235~27

[confproc] 김익식 / 2009 / 시군 통합(광역화)과 읍면동 풀뿌리자치 개편방안 / 국회 지방행정체제개편 특별위 원회 공청회자료집 / 지방행정체제개편특별위원회

[thesis] 김현수 / 2011 / 전주권 자율통합 실패원인에 대한 연구 / 석사 / 서울대학교

[journal] 박종관 / 2001 / 시,군 통합에 의한 행정구역개편 정책의 성과평가에 관한 연구 / 한국 사회 와 행정연구 12(3) : 79~101

[confproc] 박종관 / 2011 / 지방행정체제개편위원회 시･군･구 통합기준 연구 / 지방행정체제개 편위원 회 공청회 토론자료 / 지방행정체제개편특별위원회

[journal] 배득종 / 2008 / 행정구역 개편이 지역발전에 미치는 영향 / 지방재정과 지방세 10 : 31~42

[journal] 신환철 / 2010 / The Evaluation of Jeonju-Wanju Integration Process and the Tasks of the Future -Centering on the Activity of Civilian Organzation- / 한국자치행정학보 / 한국자치행정학회 24(2) : 37~62

[report] 신환철 / 2009 / 기초생활권 인접시군 협력 사업 발굴 용역 중간보고서 / 전주시

[journal] 조만형 / 2009 / 협력적 거버넌스 구축에 관한 실증적 연구: 광명시와 구로구간 환경기초시설 빅딜 사례를 중심으로 / 한국사회와 행정연구 / 서울행정학회 20(2) : 215~239

[confproc] 이기우 / 2009 / 시군통합 과연 바람직한가 / 지방자치분권포럼자료

[journal] 이종원 / 2005 / 방법론적으로 재해석한 거버넌스의 이해 / 한국행정학보 / 한국행정학회 39(1) : 329~340

[journal] 이재기 / 2000 / 시･군통합의 경제적 효과에 관한 연구 - 행정비용절감효과를 중심 으로 / 한 국지방재정논집 5(1) : 113~141

[book] 이창원 / 2008 / 종적 횡적으로 통합되어야 한다 / 미래전략연구원

[journal] 원윤희 / 2008 / 행정구역 개편이 지방세출에 미치는 영향 / 지방재정과 지방세 10 : 17~30

[thesis] 유경화 / 1999 / 시･군통합추진과정의 정치적 갈등에 관한 연구-여수반도와 무안반도를 중심으 로 / 석사 / 전남대학교

[confproc] 조성호 / 2009 / 자치단체 자율통합지원계획의 평가와 대안 / 지방자치분권포럼자료

[journal] 정재진 / 2010 / An Analysis of the Effects of Urban-Rural Districts Integration as a Learning Information for an Administrative District Reform / 지방행정연구 / 한국지방행정연구원 24(3) : 57~89

[confproc] 최병호 / 2009 / 행정체제개편의 선 해결과제, 지방재정확충：그 구체적 대안은 / 희망제작 소･한 국지방신문협회 연속토론회(부산)자료집 / 희망제작 소･한 국지방신문협회 연속토론회(부산)자료집

[journal] 최영출 / 2005 / The Financial Impacts of City-Country Consolidation, with Special Feference to Major Public Facilities in Jeju Province / 도시행정학보 / 한국도시행정학회 18(3) : 147~169

[journal] 홍준현 / 1997 / 시, 군통합에 의한 행정구역개편의 효과분석 / 한국사회와 행정연구 8(2) : 59~90

[report] 한표환 / 2009 / 기초단체통합과 지방자치 발전과제

[other] 국회예산정책처 / 2007 / 사업평가방법론연구

[other] 한국지방행정연구원 / 2008 / 지방행정체제의 개편방안

[other] 경제정의실천시민연합 / 2010 / 국회 행안위의 자치단체 통합 법안 논의 관련한 입장

[other] 한국YMCA 분권과자치위원회 / 2009 / 정구역 개편과 관련한 한국YMCA분권과자치위원회의 제안

[other] 지방행정체제개편위원회. / 2011 / 지방행정체제 개편 주요 의제 및 일정 보도자료 행정안전부 / 자치단체 자율통합

[journal] Bentrup, Gary / 2001 / Evaluation of a collaborative model: A case study of analysis of watershed planning in the Intermountain West / Environmental Management 27 : 739~48

[journal] Brown, A. J. / 2002 / Collaborative governance versus constitutional politics: Decision rules for sustainability from Australia’s South East Queensland forest agreement / Environmental Science and Policy 5 : 19~32

[journal] Chris, Ansell / 2008 / Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice / Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 : 543~571

[book] Chrislip, David / 1994 / Collaborative leadership: How citizens and civic leaders can make a difference / San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

[book] Daniels, Steven / 2001 / Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach / Westport, CT: Praeger

[journal] Edelenbos / 2005 / Institutional Implications of Interactive Governance: Insights from Dutch Practice / Governance 18(1) : 111~134

[journal] Futrell, Robert / 2003 / Technical adversarialism and participatory collaboration in the U.S. chemical weapons disposal program / Science, Technology, & Human Values 28 : 451~82

[journal] Gunton, Thomas I / 2003 / The theory and practice of collaborative planning in resource and environmental management / Environments 31(2) : 5~19

[journal] Huxham, Chris / 2003 / Theorizing collaboration practice / Public Management Review 5 : 401~23

[journal] Imperial, Mark / 2005 / Using collaboration as a governance strategy: Lessons from six watershed management programs / Administration & Society 37 : 281~320

[book] Johnson, Linda S / 2004 / Revolutionary Local Constitutional Change: The Modified R and K Theory of Consolidation Process. In City–County Consolidation and Its Alternatives: Reshaping the Local Government Landscape / Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe : 60~78

[journal] Lasker, Roz D / 2003 / Broadening participation in community problem-solving: A multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research / Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 80 : 14~60

[book] Lawrence Susskind / 1987 / Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to salving public disputes / New York; Basic Books

[journal] Logsdon, Jeanne / 1991 / Interests and interdependence in the formation of social problem-solving collaborations / Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 27 : 23~37

[journal] Manring, Susan L / 2004 / Creating an adaptive ecosystem management network among stakeholders of the Lower Roanoke River, North Carolina, USA / Ecology and Society 10(2) : 16~

[journal] Margerum, Richard D / 2002 / Collaborative planning: Building consensus and building a distinct model for practice / aJournal of Planning Education and Research 21 : 237~53

[thesis] Messinger, Boyd R. / 1989 / Local Government Restructuring: A Test of the Rosenbaum-Kammerer Theory / 박사 / University of Pittsburgh

[journal] Murdock, Barbara / 2005 / Stakeholder participation in voluntary environmental agreements: Analysis of 10 Project XL case studies. Science / Technology & Human Values 30 : 223~50

[journal] North, Peter / 2000 / Is there space for organisation from below within the UK government’s action zones / A test of ‘collaborative planning’. Urban Studies 37 : 1261~78

[book] Ostrom, Elinor / 1990 / Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action / Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[journal] Reilly, Thom / 2001 / Collaboration in action: An uncertain process / Administration in Social Work 25(1) : 53~73

[journal] Rosenbaum, W. A / 1973 / Explaining the attitude of community influentials toward government consolidation: A reappraisal of four hypotheses / Urban Affairs Quarterly 9(2) : 251~75

[journal] Roussos, Stergios Tsai / 2000 / A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health / Annual Review of Public Health 21 : 269~402

[journal] Suzanne, Leland / 2005 / When Efficiency Is Unbelievable: Normative Lessons from 30 Years of City–County Consolidations / Public Administration Review 65(4) : 475~489

[journal] Tett, Lynn / 2003 / Collaborative partnerships in community education / Journal of Education Policy 18 : 37~51

[journal] Thompson / 2006 / Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box / Public Administration Review (December)

[thesis] Thomson, Ann Marie / 2001 / Collaboration: Meaning and Measurement / 박사 / Indiana University. Bloomington.

[journal] Warner, Jeroen F / 2006 / More sustainable participation? Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated catchment management / Water Resources Development 22(1) : 15~35

[journal] Weech-Maldonado, Robert / 2000 / Building partnerships with the community: Lessons from the Camden Health Improvement Learning Collaborative / Journal of Healthcare Management 45 : 189~205

[journal] Williams,Paul / 2002 / The Competent Boundary Spanner / Public Administration 80(1) : 103~24

[book] Wondolleck, Julia M / 2000 / Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management / Washington, DC: Island Press

[journal] Wood, Donna / 1991 / Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration / Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 27(2) : 139~62

[journal] Yaffee, Steven L. / 2003 / Collaborative ecosystem planning processes in the United States: Evolution and challenges / Environments 31(2) : 59~72

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Korean Society and Public Administration 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.89