본문 바로가기
  • Home

A Comprehensive Model-Building of Organizational Evaluation: Appling a Relative Comparison Method between Evaluative Factors

  • Korean Society and Public Administration
  • Abbr : KSPA
  • 2014, 24(4), pp.1-28
  • Publisher : Seoul Association For Public Administration
  • Research Area : Social Science > Public Administration

Min, Jin 1

1국방대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This article is aimed to develop a integrative model for organizational evaluation. To get this objective, comprehensive, systematic approach is adopted in this research. I suggested two evaluative dimensions, one is organizational capability and the other is organizational performance. And I suggested two evaluative areas in organizational capability dimension, one is about basic mission and the other is about organizational management.. Research method was a relative comparison method between evaluative elements. 60 professionals took part in question. The results are: Firstly, organizational performance and mission capability were perceived more important than management capability. Secondly, in a field of mission capability, special mission capability and mission leadership were perceived more important than others. Thirdly, in a field of management capability, management & support capability, managerial leadership, organizational person management capability were perceived more important than others. Fourthly, in a field of organizational performance, goal attainment, performance on the relationship of stake-holder and society, managerial efficiency in order were perceived. Fifthly, although there were some difference between organizational species, it was not significant statistically.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.