Promoting Financial Program Assessment System: The Case of International Migration Cooperation Program (재정사업 성과평가체계 개선에 대한 연구: 국제이민협력 재정사업을 중심으로)

Jeon, Joo Sang (전주상); MUNSEOK CHO (조문석)

Promoting Financial Program Assessment System: The Case of International Migration Cooperation Program

Korean Society and Public Administration
Abbr : KSPA
2014, 24(4), pp.339-366
Publisher : Seoul Association For Public Administration
Research Area : Social Science > Public Administration

Jeon, Joo Sang ¹, MUNSEOK CHO ¹

¹한성대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study diagnoses areas for improvement in the financial program assessment system and suggests plans for the promotion of the “International Migration Cooperation Program.” Particular attention is given to the problems that the “one size fits all” assessment tool has in reflecting specific characteristics of each financial program. Using a logic model, the performance structure of the “International Migration Cooperation Program” is analyzed as a double-looped learning system. The results and suggestions are as follows: First, environmental factors and interest groups should be considered in the goal-setting stages. Second, the logical relations between the factors that contribute to goal attainment should be provided in performance plans. Third, some performance indicators are outputs rather than outcomes. As such, it is necessary to develop outcome-oriented indicators, which includes improving existing output measures.

KEYWORDS

Financial program assessment, International migration cooperation, Performance management, Performance evaluation, Performance indicator

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

[journal] 강영철 / 2009 / An Analysis for Normative Directions of Performance Indicators in the Public Sector -Focus on Central Governments- / 한국정책과학학회보 / 한국정책과학학회 13(4) : 121~141

[journal] 강황선 / 2004 / 조직성과측정체제의 재설계 방향: 조직학습이론의 관점에서 / 한국정책학회보 / 한국정책학회 13(2) : 117~142

[other] 기획예산처 / 2007 / 재정사업자율평가 및 재정운용평가 매뉴얼 / 2007년도 재정성과부문

[other] 기획재정부 / 2011 / 재정사업 성과관리제도 개선방안 마련 / 기획재정부 보도자료(2011. 1. 18)

[journal] 김동립 / 2011 / Program Logic Model: Some Conceptual Issues and Typology / 한국정책학회보 / 한국정책학회 20(1) : 269~302

[journal] 김순기 / 2002 / 정부조직의 성과관리: 균형성과표와 성과주의 예산제도의 연계 / 서강경영논총 13(2) : 31~65

[confproc] 김신 / 2000 / 미국연방정부 성과관리체계 : GPRA 시행 7년의 성과와 교훈 / 한국행정학회 하계학술대회

[journal] 공동성 / 2007 / What Determines Program Performance Ratings in Korea / 정책분석평가학회보 / 한국정책분석평가학회 17(4) : 27~56

[other] 국회예산정책처 / 2012 / 2013년도 정부성과계획서 평가

[journal] 김영록 / 2010 / An Analysis of the Appropriateness of Performance Budgeting by Government Departments: The Development & Application of "Performance Measurement Appropriateness" / 행정논총 / 한국행정연구소 48(3) : 169~193

[journal] 남승하 / 2008 / 조직의 관리적 혁신의지(innovation willingness)와 조직성과(performance)간의 관계에 관한 연구 / 한국행정학보 / 한국행정학회 42(1) : 171~196

[journal] 남승하 / 2012 / A Descriptive Study on the perception of distortions in performance measurement / GRI연구논총 / 경기개발연구원 14(3) : 119~142

[journal] 남승하 / 2010 / A Study on The Effectiveness of Performance Management System:Focussed on the Stages of Performance Management System / 현대사회와 행정 / 한국국정관리학회 20(2) : 207~235

[report] 박노욱 / 2009 / 지방재정성과관리 방안에 관한 연구 / 한국조세재정연구원

[report] 박노욱 / 2008 / 재정성과관리제도의 현황과 정채과제 / 한국조세재정연구원

[report] 박노욱 / 2012 / 재정사업성과분석과 정책적 시사점 / 한국조세연구원

[report] 박홍엽 / 2009 / 재정사업자율평가 현황과 정책과제 / 국회예산정책처

[confproc] 방문규 / 2006 / 재정사업 자율평가제도 평가결과 분석 / 한국행정학회 동계학술대회

[journal] 배인명 / 2011 / The Trend Analysis on the K-PART Scores of Implementation and Performance of Financial Programs / GRI연구논총 / 경기개발연구원 13(3) : 107~136

[other] 법무부. / 2013 / 2013년 법무부 성과관리시행계획

[other] 법무부 / 2013 / 2012년도 재정사업 자율평가 결과(일반재정)

[journal] 신민철 / 2011 / 성과측정 왜곡에 대한 인식 정향성 분석: 중앙행정기관 공무원들을 중심으로 / 한국행정연구 / 한국행정연구원 19(4) : 133~156

[other] 외국인정책위원회 / 2013 / 제2차 외국인정책 기본계획: 2013-2017

[journal] 유금록 / 2011 / An Empirical Analysis of the Validity and Reliability of Evaluation Measures for the Self-Assessment of Budgetary Programs in Korea / 정책분석평가학회보 / 한국정책분석평가학회 21(1) : 1~26

[journal] 윤기웅 / 2012 / Assessing the Program Assessment Rating Tool of Korea (K-PART): Fiscal Year 2008-2010 / 한국정책학회보 / 한국정책학회 21(2) : 91~122

[confproc] 윤상오 / 2004 / 성과관리와 평가의 역할: 공공정보화 사례를 중심으로 / 한국행정학회 추계학술대회

[journal] 이윤식 / 2007 / 우리나라에 있어서 성과관리를 위한 평가의 개선방안에 관한 연구: 를 중심으로 / 정책분석평가학회보 / 한국정책분석평가학회 17(3) : 1~30

[journal] 이석민 / 2011 / A Study on the Application and Use of Program Logic Models - A Research and Development of Evaluation Indicators for Secondhand Smoking Free Seoul! Program / 한국거버넌스학회보 / 한국거버넌스학회 18(1) : 211~242

[journal] 전주상 / 2011 / A Commentary Research on Evaluating Task Performance of Governments - Focusing on Analysing Performance Indicators of Foreigners' Policy - / 한국거버넌스학회보 / 한국거버넌스학회 18(1) : 299~319

[journal] 정무경 / 2012 / An Impact Analysis of the K-PART on the Administration’s Budget Process / 예산정책연구 / 국회예산정책처 1(2) : 135~165

[journal] 조문석 / 2012 / Reliability and Validity of Performance Measurement in the Public Sector: The Case of the National Emergency Management Agency’s 'Battle Against Fire' / 한국사회와 행정연구 / 서울행정학회 22(4) : 79~106

[other] 통계청 / 2013 / 성과관리시행계획

[book] Agyris, Chris. / 1996 / Organizational Learning : A Theory of Action Perspective(2nd edition) / Blackwell

[journal] Ammons, David N. / 1995 / Overcoming the Inadequacies of Performance in Local Government : The Case of Libraries and Leisure Services / Public Administration Review 55(1) : 31~47

[book] Amstrong, Michael. / 2005 / Managing Performance: Performance Management in Action / Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development

[book] Barnow, Burt S. / 1992 / Evaluating Welfare and Training Programs / Harvard University Press : 277~309

[journal] Behn, Robert D. / 2003 / Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures / Public Administration Review 63(5) : 586~606

[journal] Bickman, Leonard. / 2004 / The Functions of Program Theory / New Directions for Program Evaluation 33 : 5~18

[journal] Bouckaert, Geert. / 1991 / Public Productivity Measurement : Diseases and Cures / Public Productivity and Management Review 15(2) : 229~235

[book] Boyne, George A. / 2010 / Public Management and Performace; Research Directions / Cambridge University Press

[book] Downs, George W. / 1986 / The Search for Government Efficiency : Form Hubris to Helplessness / Temple University Press

[journal] Fryer, Karen. / 2009 / Performance Management in the Public Sector / International Journal of Public Sector Management 22(6) : 478~498

[book] Gray, Andrew. / 2001 / Budgeting, Auditing, and Evaluation : Functions and Integration in Seven Governments / Transaction

[book] Hatry, Harry P. / 1999 / Performance Measurement : Getting Results / Urban Institute Press

[book] Hatry, Harry P. / 1989 / Service Efforts and Accomplishments Reporting : Its Time Has Come / Governmental Accounting Standards Board

[journal] Hood, Christopher. / 1991 / A Public Management for All Seasons / Public Administration 69(1) : 3~19

[journal] Kopczynski, Mary. / 1999 / Comparative Performance Measurement: Insights and Lessons Learned from a Consortium Effort / Public Administration Review 59(2) : 124~134

[web] Liner, Blaine. / Making Result-Based State Government Work / Urban Institute / http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/results-based-stategovt.pdf

[journal] McAdam, rodney. / 2005 / Performance Management in the UK Public Sector. Addressing Multiple Stakeholder Complexity / International Journal of Public Sector Management 18(3) : 256~273

[book] Meier, Kenneth J. / 2000 / Politics and the Bureaucracy: Policymaking in the Fourth Branch of Government / Harcourt

[book] Moore, Mark Harrison. / 1995 / Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government / Harvard University Press

[journal] Moynihan, Donald P. / 2005 / Goal-Based Learning and the Future of Performance Management / Public Administration Review 65(2) : 203~216

[journal] Pollitt, Christopher. / 2001 / Clarifying Convergence : Striking similarities and Durable Differences in Public Management Reform / Public Management Review 3(4) : 491~492

[journal] Pollit, Christopher. / 2013 / Searching for Impacts in Performance-Oriented Management Reform : A Review of the European Literature / Public Performance and Management Review 37(1) : 7~22

[journal] Posner, Paul L. / 2007 / Assessing Federal Program Performance : Observations on the U. S. Office of Management and Budget's Program Assessment Rating Tool and Its Use in the Budget Process / Public Performance and Management Review 30(3) : 351~368

[journal] Renger, Ralph / 2002 / A Three-Step Approach to Teaching Logic Models / American Journal of Evaluation 23(4) : 493~503

[journal] Sterck, Miekatrien. / 2007 / The Impact of Performance Budgeting on the Role of the Legislature : A Four-Country Study / International Review of Administrative Science 73(2) : 189~203

[other] U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). / 2012 / Guideline for Performance Reporting Required by the GPRA Modernization Act of 2010

[book] Van Dooren, Wouter. / 2010 / Performance Management in the Public Sector / Routledge

[journal] Van Dooren, Wouter. / 2012 / How to Measure Public Administration Performance : A Conceptual Model with Applications for Budgeting, Human Resources Management, and Open Government / Public Performance and Management Review 35(3) : 489~508

[journal] Van Thiel, Sandra. / 2002 / The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector / Public Performance & Management Review 25(3) : 267~281

[book] Wholey, Joseph S. / 1997 / Using Performance Measurement to Improve Public and Nonprofit Programs / Jossey-Bass : 91~98

[journal] Wholey, Joseph S. / 1992 / The Case for Performance Monitoring / Public Administration Review 52(6) : 604~610

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Korean Society and Public Administration 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.89