Analysis on Conceptions and Indicators of Community Wellbeing Via Panel Data of Seoul City (서울시 패널자료를 활용한 커뮤니티웰빙 개념구조와 측정지표의 적합성 분석)

Seo, Inseok (서인석); Lee，  SeungJong (이승종); Youngwha Kee (기영화)

Analysis on Conceptions and Indicators of Community Wellbeing Via Panel Data of Seoul City

Korean Society and Public Administration
Abbr : KSPA
2014, 25(2), pp.101-130
Publisher : Seoul Association For Public Administration
Research Area : Social Science > Public Administration

Seo, Inseok ¹, Lee， SeungJong ², Youngwha Kee ¹

¹숭실대학교
²서울대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This research about among the indicators that constitute the conception of community well-being (CWB). The notion of CWB in this study is operationally defined with the three subordinate conceptual domains and the concrete indicators that amount to each domain. Upon the employment of the higher-order factors analysis, the result shows: 1) The local government and administrative services have the highest goodness-of -it measure; 2) related to household income and jobs play(s) a key role in explaining community wellbeing; 3) The of green space displays the third highest goodness-of-fit measure. This suggests that green space is significant in; and 4) Lastly, in the current model the three domains–the environmental domain, the social-political domain, the economic domain–contribute equally to the conception of community wellbeing. Whereas many international agencies such as OCED and UN put a heavy emphasis on medical and social well-fare services in the measurement of wellbeing, the further efforts to be made environment domain and local administrative services.

KEYWORDS

Indicators of community wellbeing, Higher confirmatory factor analysis, Goodness- of-it measure

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

[journal] 기영화 / 2013 / An Analysis of the Sungmisan Village Model as a Community Wellbeing Paradigm: Using Grounded Theory Method / 한국행정학보 / 한국행정학회 47(1) : 295~320

[journal] 기영화 / 2013 / Developing Community Wellbeing Indicators for Korea: Learning from International Cases / 지역발전연구 / 빈곤문제국제개발연구원 22(1) : 1~35

[book] 김계수 / 2007 / Amos 16. 0 구조방정식모형 분석 / 한나래

[journal] 김종기 / 2011 / An Analysis of Factors Influencing the Intention to Use Social Network Services / 정보화정책 / 한국정보화진흥원 18(3) : 25~49

[journal] 박도영 / 2006 / A Higher-Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis on Student Characteristics / 교육평가연구 / 한국교육평가학회 19(1) : 285~304

[journal] 배귀희 / 2011 / A Study on the Concept of Social Entrepreneurship: Using Structural Equation Modeling / 한국정책과학학회보 / 한국정책과학학회 15(2) : 199~227

[journal] 서재호 / 2012 / A Study on Community Wellbeing as a Value Orientation in Local Government / 한국행정학보 / 한국행정학회 46(1) : 33~56

[journal] 이배영 / 2009 / 지식관리 영향요인에 대한 실증적 연구: 수도권 기초자치단체를 중심으로 / 한국사회와 행정연구 / 서울행정학회 20(1) : 75~98

[journal] 이승종 / 2013 / Comparing Community Well-being Index Evaluations of Experts and Public Officials: Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process Method / 한국행정학보 / 한국행정학회 47(2) : 313~337

[journal] 이홍재 / 2008 / 지방자치단체 전자정부추진 평가모형에 대한 고찰: 모형의 신뢰성 및 타당성 검토를 중심으로 / 정책분석평가학회보 / 한국정책분석평가학회 18(4) : 69~92

[book] Campbell, A. / 1974 / Subjective Elements of Well-Being / OECD : 9~19

[book] Chanan, G. / 2002 / Development and Statistics Unit of the Home Office / Development and Statistics Unit of the Home Office

[journal] Christakopoulou, S. / 2001 / The Community Well-being Questionnaire : Theoretical Context and Initial Assessment of its Reliability and Validity / Social Indicators Research 56 : 321~351

[journal] Cuthill, M / 2002 / Coolangatta : A portrait of Community Well-being / Urban Policy and Research 20(2) : 187~203

[journal] Hartnagel, T. F. / 1979 / The perception and fear of crime : Implications for neighborhood cohesion, social activity, and community affect / Social Forces 58(1) : 176~193

[journal] Kruger, P. Stefan. / 2010 / Wellbeing-The Five Essential Elements / Applied Research Quality Life 6(3) : 325~328

[book] Kusel, J. / 1991 / Well-being in Forest-dependant Communities / Forest and Rangeland Resources Assessment Program and California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection

[web] Murphy, B. L / 2006 / Community: Defining the Concept and its Implications: Report completed for the Canadian Nuclear Waste Management Organisation / http://www.nwmo.ca/communitywellbeing.NuclearWasteManagementOrganization

[confproc] Ramsey, D. / 2002 / Rural Community Well-being: Models and Application to Changes in the Tobaccobelt in Ontario / Canada. Geoforum 33 : 367~384

[report] Scottish Development Center. / 2007 / Developing Social Prescribing and Community Referrals for Mental Health in Scotland / Healthier Scotland Scottish Government

[journal] Sirgy, M. J. / 2001 / Further validation of the Sirgy et al. ’s measure of community quality of life / Social Indicators Research 56(12) : 5~143

[journal] Sirgy, M. J. / 2000 / A method for assessing residents'satisfaction with community-based services : a quality-of-life perspective / Social Indicators Research 49(3) : 279~316

[report] White, S. C. / 2008 / But What is Wellbeing? A framework for Analysis in Social and Development Policy and Practice / Centre for Development Studies

[journal] Whorton, J. W. / 1984 / Summative scales for measuring community satisfaction / Social Indicators Research 15(3) : 297~307

[report] Wiseman, J. / 2008 / Community Wellbeing in and Unwell World: Trends, Challenges, and Possibilities / US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health

[confproc] Wilson, B. / 2007 / Modeling reflective higher-order constructs using three approaches with PLS path modeling: A monte carlo comparison / Paper presented at the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference 2007

This paper was written with support from the National Research Foundation of Korea.

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Korean Society and Public Administration 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.89