@article{ART002086011},
author={Kim, Seong Yeun},
title={The Problems and Alternatives of Official Development Assistence through Governance Approach by Analyzing Audit Cases of the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea},
journal={Korean Society and Public Administration},
issn={1225-8652},
year={2016},
volume={26},
number={4},
pages={427-452}
TY - JOUR
AU - Kim, Seong Yeun
TI - The Problems and Alternatives of Official Development Assistence through Governance Approach by Analyzing Audit Cases of the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea
JO - Korean Society and Public Administration
PY - 2016
VL - 26
IS - 4
PB - Seoul Association For Public Administration
SP - 427
EP - 452
SN - 1225-8652
AB - The purpose of this study is to improve problems of Official Development Assistence(ODA) caused from audit with governance approach.
To improve the problem, this study establishes the principle of governance implementation through meta-analysis and classifies total 102 problems of ODA into 9 types by analyzing three audit cases of the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea. This study suggests alternatives and policy implications applying governance practical strategies on the 9 type problems.
As a result, first, this study suggests the minimization of discretion of the person in charge and the release of information on manual creation and education for transparency in ODA. Second, the qualitative improvement of management systems is needed to improve the responsibility of ODA. Third, this study suggests to establishment a control tower for encouraging participation and cooperation of government departments. Fourth, the effective utilization of the ODA(Official Development Assistance) information center(www.oda.go.kr) is needed for improving the effectiveness of ODA. Finally, the principle of humanitarian approach should be considered for equity of ODA.
KW - Goevernance;Official Development Assistence;The Board of Audit and Inspection of the Republic of Korea
DO -
UR -
ER -
Kim, Seong Yeun. (2016). The Problems and Alternatives of Official Development Assistence through Governance Approach by Analyzing Audit Cases of the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea. Korean Society and Public Administration, 26(4), 427-452.
Kim, Seong Yeun. 2016, "The Problems and Alternatives of Official Development Assistence through Governance Approach by Analyzing Audit Cases of the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea", Korean Society and Public Administration, vol.26, no.4 pp.427-452.
Kim, Seong Yeun "The Problems and Alternatives of Official Development Assistence through Governance Approach by Analyzing Audit Cases of the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea" Korean Society and Public Administration 26.4 pp.427-452 (2016) : 427.
Kim, Seong Yeun. The Problems and Alternatives of Official Development Assistence through Governance Approach by Analyzing Audit Cases of the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea. 2016; 26(4), 427-452.
Kim, Seong Yeun. "The Problems and Alternatives of Official Development Assistence through Governance Approach by Analyzing Audit Cases of the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea" Korean Society and Public Administration 26, no.4 (2016) : 427-452.
Kim, Seong Yeun. The Problems and Alternatives of Official Development Assistence through Governance Approach by Analyzing Audit Cases of the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea. Korean Society and Public Administration, 26(4), 427-452.
Kim, Seong Yeun. The Problems and Alternatives of Official Development Assistence through Governance Approach by Analyzing Audit Cases of the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea. Korean Society and Public Administration. 2016; 26(4) 427-452.
Kim, Seong Yeun. The Problems and Alternatives of Official Development Assistence through Governance Approach by Analyzing Audit Cases of the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea. 2016; 26(4), 427-452.
Kim, Seong Yeun. "The Problems and Alternatives of Official Development Assistence through Governance Approach by Analyzing Audit Cases of the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea" Korean Society and Public Administration 26, no.4 (2016) : 427-452.
