Comparative Research on Quasi-regulation among Australia, US and Korea (유사행정규제의 개선방안 연구: 미국, 호주, 한국의 비교사례분석)

김신; Choi jin sik (최진식)

Comparative Research on Quasi-regulation among Australia, US and Korea

Journal of Regulation Studies
2017, 26(2), pp.3-35
Publisher : 한국규제학회
Research Area : Social Science > Public Administration

김신 ¹, Choi jin sik ²

¹행정연구원
²국민대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study focuses on exploring the ways of rationalizing quasi-regulation in Korea through comparative research on quasi-regulation among Korea, Australia, and US. Various aspects of quasi-regulation are examined by adopting a research model analyzing major indicators such as inclusion, transparency, accountability, coherence, efficacy, adaptability, efficiency, conformity with public laws, effectiveness, and compliance. The tasks of Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency in Korea, the National Standard for Organic and Biodynamic Produce in Australia, 33/50 Program in US are compared based on the conceptual model. Some implications could be derived from the analysis of quasi-regulation as follows. First, various stake-holders have to be included in decision making and enforcement of quasi-regulation. Second, regular inspection and assessment are needed to monitor whether quasi-regulation agencies are equipped with performance capacity. Third, voluntary compliance should play an important role of achieving performance targets of quasi-regulation

KEYWORDS

Quasi-regulation, National Standard for Organic and Biodynamic Produce, 33/50 Program, Regulation for Occupational Safety and Health

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

[journal] 강휘원 / 2002 / Self-Regulatory Internet Governance: Design and Policy Implications / 한국행정학보 / 한국행정학회 36(3) : 185~205

[book] 이명구 / 2013 / 산재예방 집행의 중장기 전략과 비전 / 고용노동부

[journal] 이혁우 / 2009 / A Consideration of the Concept of Regulation / 행정논총 / 한국행정연구소 47(3) : 336~358

[journal] 이혜영 / 2011 / A Study on the Regulations of Public Agencies in the Financial Sector / 규제연구 / 한국규제학회 20(2) : 151~174

[report] 이혜영 / 2010 / 공공기관 유사행정규제 정비방안 / 광운대학교 산학협력단

[report] 조성한 / 2012 / 산업안전보건 행정조직의 합리화 방안 연구 / 경제사회발전노사정위원회

[journal] 최병선 / 2009 / Reclassifying Regulatory Instruments and Options / 행정논총 / 한국행정연구소 47(2) : 1~30

[report] 최유성 / 2013 / 대안적 규제전략의 활용 실태에 관한 연구 / 한국행정연구원

[other] 한국산업안전공단 노동조합 / 2007 / 주요선진국사례를통한우리나라안전관리정책방향 / 한국산업안전공단 노동조합

[book] Abbott, K. / 2009 / The politics of global regulation / Princeton University Press

[other] APEC-OECD / 2005 / APEC-OECD Integrated Checklist On Regulatory Reform / APEC-OECD

[other] Australia Government's Department of Industry / 2014 / Industry Officer's Guide to Regulation Reform

[report] Australian Law Reform Commission / 2012 / Classification-Content Regulation and Convergent Media

[book] Balleisen, E.J. / 2009 / New Perspectives on Regulation / The Tobin Project

[book] Benzen, A. / 2012 / Food Security in Australia / Springer : 281~296

[book] Cafaggi, F. / 2006 / Self-regulation in European private law / Kluwer

[other] Cafaggi, F. / 2014 / New foundations of transnational private regulation, EUI w.p. Private regulation series

[journal] Cafaggi, F. / 2012 / Public and Private Regulation Mapping the Labyrinth / CEPS 370 : 1~35

[other] CIC on Quasi-regulation / 1997 / Grey-letter law / Commonwealth Interdepartmental Committee on Quasi-regulation

[report] Coglianese, C. / 2004 / The Role of Governmentin Corporate Governance / Center for Business and Government, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University

[journal] Khana, M. / 1999 / EPA's voluntary 33/50 program: Impact on toxic releases and economic performance of firms / Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37 : 1~25

[other] / National standard for organic and bio-dynamic produce (Edition 3.5, Last updated 1 February 2013)

[journal] Neeson, R. / 2010 / Organic standards and certification in Australia / Primefact 1047 : 1~3

[other] OECD / 2002 / OECD Reviews of Regulatory Reform: Regulatory Policies In OECD Countries / OECD

[other] Sam, A. / 2004 / Voluntary pollution reductions and the enforcement of environmental law: An empirical study of the 33/50 program / University of Arizona

[book] U.S. EPA / 2015 / 33/50 programs: The final record / U. S. EPA

[journal] Vidovic, M. / 2007 / Can voluntary pollution prevention programs fulfill their promise? Further evidence from the EPA's 33/50 program / Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55 : 180~195

[journal] Wynen, E. / 2007 / Winners and losers with harmonization of organic guarantee systems / Journal of Organic Systems 2(1) : 72~98

[journal] Wynen, E / 2008 / Standards and compliance systems for organic and bio-dynamic agriculture in Australia: Past, present and future / Journal of Organic Systems 2(2) : 38~55

[journal] Yesim Yilmaz / 1998 / Private Regulation: A Real Alternative for Regulatory Reform / Cato Policy Analysis 303 : 1~38

[journal] Zatz, M. / 1999 / The United States Environmental Protection Agency's 33/50Program: The anatomy of a successful voluntary pollution reduction program / Journal of Cleaner Protection 7 : 17~26

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Journal of Regulation Studies 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 0.78