Modern English Education 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.55
-
pISSN : 1598-0782 / eISSN : 2586-6141
- https://journal.kci.go.kr/meeso
KJCKorea
Journal Central
Effects of Blended Design on Students' Revision and Writing Development
- Modern English Education
- Abbr : MEESO
- 2012, 13(1), pp.1-17
- Publisher : The Modern English Education Society
- Research Area : Humanities > English Language and Literature > English Language Teaching
1부경대학교
Accredited
ABSTRACT
In the field of teaching second language writing, it has been questioned whether written corrective feedback is effective or not. In responding to this contentious and ongoing question, this study was conducted to introduce a newly designed instructional strategy in writing and test its efficacy over both short and long periods of time. Intermediate level university students (N=85) received three different types of feedback, namely, blended, conventional, and control, and 425 writing samples were analyzed from the pretest, posttest 1, and posttest 2, respectively. The results indicate that there was no difference between the blended design and conventional feedback group in reducing the error rates over a short-term period. However, striking differences found between two groups over a long term period imply that the newly designed instructional strategy is much more effective than its counterparts (in the conventional and control groups) in reducing error rates and multiplying the effect of revision on the subsequent and new pieces of writing. Before jumping to any harsh conclusion, the researcher postulates that further research validating the findings of the result is highly desirable, and will deepen the understanding toward the nature of complex and context-sensitive second language writing.
KEYWORDS
Statistics
-
230 Viewed
-
48 Downloaded
Tools
Issue List
Citation status
* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.
[journal]
Ashwell, T
/ 2000
/ Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?
/ Journal of Second Language Writing
9(3)
: 227~257
[journal]
Bitchener, J
/ 2008
/ Evidence in support of written corrective feedback
/ Journal of Second Language Writing
17(2)
: 102~118
[journal]
Bitchener, J
/ 2008
/ The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students
/ Language Teaching Research
12(3)
: 409~431
[journal]
Bitchener, J
/ 2005
/ The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing
/ Journal of Second Language Writing
14(3)
: 191~205
[journal]
Bruton, A
/ 2009
/ Improving accuracy is not the only reason for writing, and even if it were
/ System
37(4)
: 600~613
[journal]
Chandler, J
/ 2003
/ The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing
/ Journal of Second Language Writing
12(3)
: 267~296
[journal]
Ellis, R
/ 2005
/ Principles of instructed language learning
/ System
33(2)
: 209~224
[journal]
Ellis, R.
/ 2008
/ The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context
/ System
36(3)
: 353~371
[book]
Fathman, A
/ 1990
/ Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content, In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom
/ Cambridge University Press
: 178~190
[book]
Ferris, D. R
/ 2003
/ Response to student writing: Implications for second language students
/ Lawrence Erlbaum
[journal]
Ferris, D. R
/ 2010
/ Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA
/ Studies in Second Language Acquisition
32
: 181~201
[confproc]
Ferris, D. R
/ 2000
/ Was Truscott right? New evidence on the effects of error correction in L2 writing classes
/ Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics Conference
[journal]
Ferris, D. R
/ 2001
/ Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?
/ Journal of Second Language Writing
10
: 161~184
[book]
Folse, K. S
/ 2004
/ Great paragraphs
/ Houghton Mifflin Company
[journal]
Guénette, D
/ 2007
/ Is feedback pedagogically correct?: Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing
/ Journal of Second Language Writing
16(1)
: 40~53
[journal]
Han, Z. H
/ 2002
/ A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output
/ TESOL Quarterly
36
: 543~572
[journal]
Kim, Jin-Wan
/ 1997
/ A balanced approach to second language writing: Focus on product and process variables
/ English Teaching
52(4)
: 51~90
[journal]
Kumaravadivelu, B
/ 1994
/ The post-methodology condition: (E)merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching
/ TESOL Quarterly
28
: 27~48
[book]
Kumaravadivelu, B
/ 2006
/ Understanding language teaching: From methodology to postmethodology
/ Lawrence Erlbaum
[journal]
Lalande, F., II
/ 1982
/ Reducing composition errors: An experiment
/ Modern Language Journal
66
: 140~149
[journal]
Diane Lemonnier Schallert
/ 200809
/ Meeting in the margins: Effects of the teacher-student relationship on revision processes of EFL college students taking a composition course
/ JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING
/ PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
17(3)
: 165~182
[book]
Lu, Y
/ 2011
/ Direct or indirect written corrective feedback
/ Lambert Academic Publishing
[journal]
Mehnert, U
/ 1998
/ The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance
/ Studies in Second Language Acquisition
20(1)
: 83~108
[journal]
Nicholas, H
/ 2001
/ Recasts as feedback to language learners
/ Language Learning
51
: 719~758
[journal]
Norman, W. E
/ 2010
/ Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy
/ Language Teaching Research
14(4)
: 445~463
[journal]
Norman, W. E
/ 2011
/ The efficacy of dynamic written corrective feedback for university-matriculated ESL learners
/ System
39(2)
: 229~239
[journal]
Park, Chongwon
/ 2007
/
Revisiting error analysis in English composition.
/ 영어교육연구
/ 팬코리아영어교육학회
19(1)
: 57~3
[journal]
Robb, T
/ 1986
/ Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality
/ TESOL Quarterly
20(1)
: 83~95
[book]
Roberts, M
/ 1995
/ Awareness and the efficacy of error correction, In Attention and awareness in foreign language learning
/ Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre
: 163~182
[journal]
Sachs, R
/ 2007
/ Learners' uses of two types of written feedback on a L2 writing revision task
/ Studies in Second Language Acquisition
29(1)
: 67~100
[journal]
Semke, H
/ 1984
/ The effects of the red pen
/ Foreign Language Annals
17
: 195~202
[journal]
Sheen, Younghee
/ 2007
/ The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles
/ TESOL Quarterly
41
: 255~283
[journal]
Sheen, Younghee
/ 2010
/ Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom
/ Studies in Second Language Acquisition
32
: 203~234
[book]
Sheen, Younghee
/ 2011
/ Corrective feedback, individual differences and second language learning (1st ed.)
/ Springer
[journal]
Sheen, Younghee
/ 2009
/ Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners
/ System
37(4)
: 556~569
[journal]
Song, Mi-Jeong
/ 1998
/ Relationship between types of written feedback and development of English writing skills
/ English Teaching
53(2)
: 135~156
[journal]
Truscott, J
/ 1999
/ The case for "The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes": A response to Ferris
/ Journal of Second Language Writing
8(2)
: 111~122
[journal]
Truscott, J
/ 2004
/ Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler
/ Journal of Second Language Writing
13(4)
: 337~343
[journal]
Truscott, J
/ 2007
/ The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately
/ Journal of Second Language Writing
16(4)
: 255~272
[journal]
Truscott, J
/ 2008
/ Error correction, revision, and learning
/ Journal of Second Language Writing
17(4)
: 292~305