Negotiation of Meaning in Peer Revision Sessions in a College English Composition Classroom

Hoyeol Ryu (류호열)

Negotiation of Meaning in Peer Revision Sessions in a College English Composition Classroom

Modern English Education
Abbr : MEESO
2014, 15(1), pp.125~152
Publisher : The Modern English Education Society
Research Area : Humanities > English Language and Literature > English Language Teaching

Hoyeol Ryu ¹

¹한경대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

Peer revision provides English writing learners with a collaborative learning experience in which they discuss problems in the text with their peers for its revision. It is assumed in the revision activity that successful negotiation of meaning among peers is critical for the successful revision of the text. For the purpose of examining how meaning is negotiated in peer revision sessions, this study was conducted for Korean college EFL writing learners. They were asked to revise their papers with the peers twice for each of their writing assignments. Their meaning-negotiation process in the class was recorded, transcribed and analyzed for the study, and five episodes, which clearly represent the negotiation process, were selected and presented in the study. Among the factors that influence the negotiation are their ability to provide and determine valid feedback for revision, the writer's authorship, and stances each student takes toward the peers identified as important factors influencing the interaction and the successful completion of the task. This study also identified the need for examining the interaction between the readers as an area for further research.

KEYWORDS

teaching writing, peer revision, negotiation of meaning

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.

[journal] Allaei, S. K. / 1990 / Exploring dynamics of cross-cultural collaboration in writing classrooms / Writing Instructor 10(1) : 19~28

[journal] Bruffee, K. A. / 1984 / Collaborative learning and conversation of mankind / College English 46(7) : 635~652

[journal] Byrd, D. R. / 2003 / Practical tips for implementing peer editing tasks in the foreign language classroom / Foreign Language Annals 36(3) : 434~441

[journal] Carson, J. G. / 1996 / Chinese students' perception of ESL peer response group interaction / Journal of Second Language Writing 5(1) : 1~19

[journal] Cho, K. / 2010 / Student revision with peer and expert reviewing / Learning and Instruction 20 : 328~338

[book] Corrigan, A. / 1979 / Michigan test of English language proficiency(Form P) / English Language Institute, University of Michigan

[journal] De Guerrero, M. C. M. / 2000 / Activating the ZPD : Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision / Modern Language Journal 84(1) : 51~68

[journal] DiPardo, A. / 1988 / Peer response groups in the writing classroom : Theoretical foundations and new directions / Review of Educational Research 58(2) : 119~149

[book] Donato, R. / 1994 / Vygotskian approaches to second language research / Ablex : 33~56

[book] Emig, J. / 1971 / The composing processes of twelfth graders / NCTE Press

[book] Fitzgerald, J. / 1992 / Towards knowledge in writing : Illustrations from revision studies / Springer-Verlag

[journal] Flower, L. / 1979 / Writer-based prose : A cognitive basis for problems in writing / College English 41(1) : 19~37

[journal] Hu, G. / 2010 / Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy : Exploring peer revision in second language writing class / Instructional Science 38(4) : 371~394

[journal] Lee, G. / 2008 / Constructing trust between teacher and students through Feedback and revision cycles in an EFL writing classroom / Written Communication 25(4) : 506~537

[journal] Lee, I. / 2003 / How do Hong Kong English teachers correct errors in student writing? / Education Journal 31(1) : 153~169

[journal] Liou, H. / 2009 / Training effects on computer-mediated peer revision / System 37(3) : 514~525

[journal] Lockhart, C. / 1995 / Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups : Stances, functions, and content / Language Learning 45(4) : 605~655

[journal] Mangelsdorf, K. / 1992 / ESL student response stances in a peer revision task / Journal of Second Language Writing 1 : 235~254

[journal] McGroarty, M. E. / 2010 / Triangulation in classroom research : A Study of peer revision / Language Learning 47(1) : 1~43

[journal] Mendoça, C. / 1994 / Peer revision negotiations : Revision activities in ESL writing instruction / TESOL Quarterly 28(4) : 745~769

[journal] Min, H. / 2005 / Training students to become successful peer revisioners / System 33(2) : 293~308

[journal] Min, H. / 2006 / The effects of trained peer revision on EFL students' revision types and writing quality / Journal of Second Language Writing 15(2) : 118~141

[journal] Min, H. / 2008 / Reader stances and writer perceptions in EFL peer revision training / English for Specific Purposes 27 : 285~305

[book] Mittan, R. / 1989 / Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students / Longman : 207~219

[book] Murray, D. M. / 1978 / Research on composing: Points of departure / National Council of Teachers of English. : 85~104

[journal] Nelson, G. L. / 1993 / Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? / TESOL Quarterly 27(1) : 135~141

[journal] Newkirk, T. / 1984 / How students read student papers : An exploratory study / Written Communication 1 : 283~305

[journal] Perl, S. / 1979 / The composing processes of unskilled college writers / Research in the Teaching of English 13 : 317~336

[journal] Prior, P. / 1995 / Tracing authoritative and internally persuasive discourses : A case study of response, revision, and disciplinary enculturation / Research in the Teaching of English 29(3) : 288~325

[thesis] Ryu, Ho-Yeol. / 1997 / Threshold level of English-language proficiency for EFL writing: Effect of the interaction between English-language proficiency and writing skills on Korean college students' EFL writing / 박사 / University of Florida

[journal] Stanley, J. / 1992 / Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators / Journal of Second Language Writing 1(3) : 217~233

[journal] Steendam, E. / 2010 / The effect of instruction type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of higher-order peer feedback in EFL / Learning and Instruction 20(4) : 316~327

[journal] Suzuki, M. / 2008 / Japanese learners' self revisions and peer revisions of their written compositions in English / TESOL Quarterly 42(2) : 209~233

[journal] Tsui, A. B. / 2000 / Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? / Journal of Second Language Writing 9 : 147~170

[journal] Villamil, O. S. / 1996 / Peer revision in the L2 classroom : Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior / Journal of Second Language Writing 5(1) : 51~75

[journal] Zhang, S. / 1995 / Thoughts on some recent evidence concerning the affective advantage of peer feedback / Journal of Second Language Writing 8(3) : 321~326

[journal] Zhao, H. / 2010 / Investigating learners' use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing : A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom / Assessing Writing 15(1) : 3~17

[journal] Zhu, W. / 2001 / Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups / Journal of Second Language Writing 10 : 251~276

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Modern English Education 2024 KCI Impact Factor : 1.49