본문 바로가기
  • Home

Effects of Different Voice-Chat Conditions on EFL Learners’ Topic Negotiation According to Proficiency Levels

  • Modern English Education
  • Abbr : MEESO
  • 2017, 18(1), pp.49~74
  • Publisher : The Modern English Education Society
  • Research Area : Humanities > English Language and Literature > English Language Teaching
  • Published : February 28, 2017

Kim, Nayoung 1

1이화여자대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study investigates the effects of different voice-chat conditions on Korean EFL learners’ topic negotiation according to proficiency levels. Participants consisted of 123 EFL learners who enrolled in Speaking English I at a Korean university. They were divided into three proficiency levels: beginning, intermediate, and advanced. Then, they were further classified into two experimental groups: human-to-human voice-chat and human-to-robot voice-chat. During the experiment, participants practiced speaking with two different voice-chat conditions. Chat scripts were chosen at random and analyzed by counting the number of topic negotiation moves. With the descriptive statistics, paired samples t-tests and independent t-tests were administered. Major findings are as follows: Beginning learners in human-to-robot voice-chat initiated more topics, and avoided the topics less often, as time went by. Intermediate and advanced learners in both voice-chat conditions stayed on the topic more often, over time. Intermediate learners became less likely to avoid the topic in human-to-robot voicechat, while advanced learners did in human-to-human voice-chat. In an interview, participants in both experimental groups revealed positive reactions to voice-chat experience. Based on these findings, pedagogical suggestions are provided for the effective implementation of voice-chat in EFL contexts.

Journal Copyright Policy

BY-NC 아이콘

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2025 are currently being built.