본문 바로가기
  • Home

The Reciprocal Transformations of Elements: The Quick and the Slow

김신 1

1한국외국어대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

In this paper, I argue for the revisionist account of prime matter, according to which Aristotle’s metaphysics does not require the common matter in allowing the reciprocal transformations of elements. First, ‘matter’ in Aristotle’s work is analyzed into three distinguishable definitions: the material definition, the substratum definition, and the potentiality definition. Second, the traditionalist account of prime matter is shown to satisfy all three definitions. It is then pointed out that the traditionalist notion of a sheer potentiality is unintelligible. This is shown with the help from the recent intermediate account of prime matter. Third, I argue for the revisionist account of prime matter on two grounds. Section 4 establishes that Aristotle can do without prime matter in allowing the elemental changes. And, more importantly, it is argued in section 5 that the traditionalist account fails to accommodate Aristotle’s remark that some elemental changes take more time than other such changes, while the revisionist can easily account for the remark. This paper concludes with a thought, acknowledging a couple of further research tasks in completing the revisionist account of prime matter.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.