KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART002254308},
author={Maeng, Jooman},
title={Virtue, Rule, and a Lie},
journal={Philosophical Investigation},
issn={1598-7213},
year={2017},
volume={47},
pages={25-55},
doi={10.33156/philos.2017.47..002}

TY - JOUR
AU - Maeng, Jooman
TI - Virtue, Rule, and a Lie
JO - Philosophical Investigation
PY - 2017
VL - 47
IS - null
PB - Institute of philosophy in Chung-Ang Univ.
SP - 25
EP - 55
SN - 1598-7213
AB - In this paper I will try to show the third possible solution based on critical evaluation under which virtue ethics, Kant's ethics, and utilitarianism failed theoretically as they didn't succeed in provide practical action-guide. I think an ethical theory need to be able to admit of ‘a white lie’ if it would be one for right and wrong. For this I will examine ‘Lie Argument’ of Kant as an example. On this processing, finally I will take the view that it would be modified and altered Kant's deontology as practical action-guide theory.
KW - virtue;moral rule;and lie;virtue ethics;deontology;utilitarianism;action-guide
DO - 10.33156/philos.2017.47..002
ER -

Maeng, Jooman. (2017). Virtue, Rule, and a Lie. Philosophical Investigation, 47, 25-55.

Maeng, Jooman. 2017, "Virtue, Rule, and a Lie", Philosophical Investigation, vol.47, pp.25-55. Available from: doi:10.33156/philos.2017.47..002

Maeng, Jooman "Virtue, Rule, and a Lie" Philosophical Investigation 47 pp.25-55 (2017) : 25.

Maeng, Jooman. Virtue, Rule, and a Lie. 2017; 47 25-55. Available from: doi:10.33156/philos.2017.47..002

Maeng, Jooman. "Virtue, Rule, and a Lie" Philosophical Investigation 47(2017) : 25-55.doi: 10.33156/philos.2017.47..002

Maeng, Jooman. Virtue, Rule, and a Lie. Philosophical Investigation, 47, 25-55. doi: 10.33156/philos.2017.47..002

Maeng, Jooman. Virtue, Rule, and a Lie. Philosophical Investigation. 2017; 47 25-55. doi: 10.33156/philos.2017.47..002

Maeng, Jooman. Virtue, Rule, and a Lie. 2017; 47 25-55. Available from: doi:10.33156/philos.2017.47..002

Maeng, Jooman. "Virtue, Rule, and a Lie" Philosophical Investigation 47(2017) : 25-55.doi: 10.33156/philos.2017.47..002