본문 바로가기
  • Home

The Critical Analysis of Lee Han Gi “Gando” Theory - To Establish the Correct Gando Territory Theory -

Choi Jang-Keun 1

1대구대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

The critical points of this study are summarized as follows. In other words, Hangi-Lee said that have to succession laws of the Republic of Korea on procedures for solving problem after reunification. North Korea joined the United Nations with korea in 1990, but the resolution process may change because this paper wrote before. Hangi-Lee said that the Kando problem must go back before Japan's intervention on Critical Date. However, It was more than 100 years since 1909 Kando Convention tolerated by the Chinese occupation. what will you do? Hangi-Lee said that the legality of Kando Convention is invalid beacause Japan got the Kando of Korea territory to China without any separate treaty. In general, it is difference that Japan have no Diplomatic bargaining for Korea's territorial disposition. Hangi-Lee said violates the law of estoppel because China claimed the new boundaries with the boundary of Yalu River - the Tumen(頭滿) River but China claimed with the boundary of Yalu River - the Tomun(土門) Riverat Beaktusan Jeonggyebi. It must be accepted that reasonable logic. However, there are many parts can not be accommodate according to the change of the times and such as the lack of research level,

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.