@article{ART002614067},
author={HWANG Bongmo},
title={A comparative study of Takiji Kobayashi’s “absent landlord” and Lee Ki-young’s “hometown”},
journal={日本硏究},
issn={1229-6309},
year={2020},
number={53},
pages={209-228},
doi={10.20404/jscau.2020.08.53.209}
TY - JOUR
AU - HWANG Bongmo
TI - A comparative study of Takiji Kobayashi’s “absent landlord” and Lee Ki-young’s “hometown”
JO - 日本硏究
PY - 2020
VL - null
IS - 53
PB - The Center for Japanese Studies
SP - 209
EP - 228
SN - 1229-6309
AB - This article is a comparative analysis of the rural novel “absent landlord” of Takiji Kobayashi and the rural novel “hometown” of Lee Ki-young.
As we have seen, “absent landlord” and “hometown” have similarities and differences.
The similarity between Takiji Kobayashi’s “absent landlord” and Lee Ki-young’s “hometown” is that village farmers are bothered by the high tenant fees of landlords, that landlords are absent landlords, that the character of middle manager are the same, that the landlord has a relationship the state power, and that the villagers win the dispute.
On the other hand, the difference between “absent landlord” and “hometown” is that the relationship between farmers and workers is different, the object of the fight is different, character of the landowner is different, and the “hometown” has a Dure.
In conclusion, the development of capitalism is slower in “hometown” than in “absent landlord”. This is because village farmers in “absent landlord” win a dispute by establishing a labor-management alliance and village farmers in “Hometown” win by threatening Ahn Seung-hak’s family history. However, there is hope in “hometown”. This is because villagers in “hometown” recognize that the triumph of a dispute is a temporary victory. That is why you can have hope in “hometown”.
KW - Takiji Kobayashi;“absent landlord”;Lee Ki-young;hometown;a rural novel
DO - 10.20404/jscau.2020.08.53.209
ER -
HWANG Bongmo. (2020). A comparative study of Takiji Kobayashi’s “absent landlord” and Lee Ki-young’s “hometown”. 日本硏究, 53, 209-228.
HWANG Bongmo. 2020, "A comparative study of Takiji Kobayashi’s “absent landlord” and Lee Ki-young’s “hometown”", 日本硏究, no.53, pp.209-228. Available from: doi:10.20404/jscau.2020.08.53.209
HWANG Bongmo "A comparative study of Takiji Kobayashi’s “absent landlord” and Lee Ki-young’s “hometown”" 日本硏究 53 pp.209-228 (2020) : 209.
HWANG Bongmo. A comparative study of Takiji Kobayashi’s “absent landlord” and Lee Ki-young’s “hometown”. 2020; 53 : 209-228. Available from: doi:10.20404/jscau.2020.08.53.209
HWANG Bongmo. "A comparative study of Takiji Kobayashi’s “absent landlord” and Lee Ki-young’s “hometown”" 日本硏究 no.53(2020) : 209-228.doi: 10.20404/jscau.2020.08.53.209
HWANG Bongmo. A comparative study of Takiji Kobayashi’s “absent landlord” and Lee Ki-young’s “hometown”. 日本硏究, 53, 209-228. doi: 10.20404/jscau.2020.08.53.209
HWANG Bongmo. A comparative study of Takiji Kobayashi’s “absent landlord” and Lee Ki-young’s “hometown”. 日本硏究. 2020; 53 209-228. doi: 10.20404/jscau.2020.08.53.209
HWANG Bongmo. A comparative study of Takiji Kobayashi’s “absent landlord” and Lee Ki-young’s “hometown”. 2020; 53 : 209-228. Available from: doi:10.20404/jscau.2020.08.53.209
HWANG Bongmo. "A comparative study of Takiji Kobayashi’s “absent landlord” and Lee Ki-young’s “hometown”" 日本硏究 no.53(2020) : 209-228.doi: 10.20404/jscau.2020.08.53.209